Supreme Court To Hear Telemarketer Case
from the how-is-keeping-85%-of-the-money-not-fraud? dept
The Supreme Court will hear a case this week questioning whether or not a telemarketing company that only gave 15% of the money they raised to the charity they claimed they were supporting was committing fraud. Telemarketers, not exactly known for being the most trustworthy bunch say that if the court rules against them it will hinder their ability to raise money for charities. Say what? There's a clear difference between a charity raising money, and a telemarketing firm tossing a tiny portion of the money they raise to a charity. If the telemarketing firm doesn't make it clear that they're going to keep 85% of the money you give them, then something is wrong. I realize that most people don't know that many charity fund-raisers end up keeping a large percentage of the proceeds, but 85% goes beyond any reasonable line.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
charity scam
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
When the person at the other end starts the conversation with " I'm a paid solicitor for .... " I think they are required by law to do this and if a solicitor doesn't start the conversation this way, I always ask.
Say, " I don't talk to paid solicitors " and immediately hang up.
It's unfortunate because I think I do hurt some charities this way but I'd learned a long time ago that paid solicitors keep the lions share of your contribution.
[ link to this | view in thread ]