Music Giants Look To Merge

from the hide-the-problem dept

When the business you're in is collapsing around you, one way to hide your head in the sand is to simply merge with competitors. That's what looks to be happening in the music industry as the five major labels are all trying to figure out how to consolidate. There's any number of reasons for this, but mostly, the old guard simply has no idea what to do in the new digital world - and they're hoping by getting bigger, it will make the problem go away. Instead, what's more likely to happen is that in the merger mania, it will allow smaller, nimbler, smarter new record labels to take advantage of new technologies and new attitudes towards music, while making the old guard increasingly obsolete.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    MIchael, 14 Mar 2003 @ 6:55am

    Inventory valuations

    The true valuatioons of the former major music companies continues to be inflated. Somehere in the business plans, these companies still list a back catalog value, as if it was still possible to re-issue older songs from a propriatory position. Even if they could re-establish control over music distrbution, at some point some one is going to force them to prove ownership of copyright and distribution rights to the stock of music they are claiming. This point came up momentarily during the first Napster trials, and then was quickly dropped from sight. They have bought and sold contracts and catalogs en masse for so long between themselves, without having a central copyrighth registration, that it is doubtful they could ever actually "come up with a receiept" for what they claim to own. In the past, the point wasn't saliant, because basically .. who else would care? No one else could do anything with pressing plants and distribution channels. Now there are growing internet, and other digital alternatives. With the discovery , and reversal of the "work for hire" ..ahhh.. trick.. their back catlog value continues to errode... and in fact, because of the increasing cost of maintaining a hostile defence over songs they can not sell, is becomming a liabilty.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    thecaptain, 14 Mar 2003 @ 8:20am

    The bigger they are...

    ...the more lawmakers they can buy no?

    We've already seen that they have no desire to "understand" the new digital reality...they only want to legislate it into oblivion and guarantee their profits.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.