Why We Should Lose The Back Button?
from the not-this-again dept
While, in general, I think people who focus on user interface design issues are very important, I'm beginning to get tired of the really outspoken ones who insist on somewhat outlandish ideas for their own personal satisfaction. The latest is this obsession with getting rid of the back button in the browser, championed by Richard Mander. His argument makes sense at first. The back button is poorly designed and doesn't really tell you where you're going properly. However, at this point, most people know where it is and what it does. Changing a basic navigational item once people understand it and are used to it doesn't make much sense and tends to cause a lot more confusion in the long run. In the article, he also complains about a number of other user interface design standards. You begin to realize that what he really wants is for everything to be completely dumbed down. One of the nice things about the web is that once you figure it out, it all makes sense. Sure, there's a bit of a learning curve, but how many people do you know have decided they can't figure it out? It only takes a very quick experimentation to understand how it works, and then it works great. Mander assumes that no one can use the web, and it needs to be dumbed down even more. It's no wonder he was a fan of the annoying paper clip from Microsoft Office. I'm mildly suprised that this is the first mainstream tech news article I've seen in ages about user interface design that doesn't mention Jakob Nielsen.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Dumbest thing I've ever heard
Perhaps the real problem here is that a web browser must fill conflicting needs. If a web browser were always just a window for displaying trusted, properly designed content, then it wouldn't need any buttons at all outside the viewing area. But because it can be used to view untrusted and/or poorly designed (or even maliciously designed) pages, it needs to have certain navigation buttons available that don't depend on content.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Dumbest thing I've ever heard
Much of internet navigation is from searth pages. It seems that he is argueing for consistant navigation from a master page. Never mind that I do not want a master navigation page wrapper a la hotmail. I already have one: the browser interface and its back button.
The most functional new device I have bought in the last two years is a logitec mouse with a back button under the thumb.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Easy to ?
I don't mind having to learn something new as long as the UI is designed to make getting things done with the software efficient.
Jason
[ link to this | view in chronology ]