Music Industry, Webcasters Agree On Royalty Rate
from the which-webcasters? dept
Remember all the stories last year about the battles between the RIAA and webcasters about how much they should pay for webcasting online? Back in November it was announced they had reached a solution that made most people happy, but, for some reason, today they announced another solution. What I'm wondering on all of these is who, exactly, is representing the entire set of webcasters out there. It seems like a difficult group to get to work together under a single banner. I'd imagine, like in previous negotiations, that it's basically a few of the larger webcasters hammering out a sweetheart deal for themselves.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Clarification. I think.
The two sides agreed Thursday on how much big webcasters like Yahoo!, America Online, Microsoft and RealNetworks must pay to broadcast songs over the Internet during 2003 and 2004.
And from the article you linked to (and the yahoo one too):
SoundExchange said the proposal did not cover rates for noncommercial Webcasters or simultaneous broadcasts of over-the-air radio transmissions.
So yeah, I think you're right Mike. It does look like the big guys inking a sweet deal for themselves. But I think it only affects them. Hopefully.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]