Game On(line) For Microsoft, Sony

from the which-strategy-will-win? dept

As both Sony and Microsoft push their gaming consoles into online gaming, there are questions over who has the better strategy? Microsoft, as they're known to do, has a completely proprietary, completely controlled system for offering online games. Sony, on the other hand, is going with a more open system, giving people the tools and letting game makers build their own online gaming offerings. Now, the battle is on to see which model is going to win over consumers.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Huw, 15 Apr 2003 @ 9:57am

    No Subject Given

    I think the Microsoft 'closed' system has the upper hand - companies don't want to work on all the hassle of billing, connectivity etc., and Microsoft always releases in depth SDK's and sample code etc. for any of its systems.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      dorpus, 15 Apr 2003 @ 11:50am

      Re: No Subject Given

      Makes sense. For all that techies have to say about the virtues of open systems, the fact is that most Windows crashes are caused by bad DLL's built by non-MS vendors.

      Microsoft has better expertise in its own operating system, so they tend to be more stable.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Real Radix, 22 Apr 2003 @ 4:36am

    Monthly charges

    As a consumer, I prefer Sony's online offering as it is free, whereas Microsoft requires a monthly fee to access their XBox Live servers.

    However the major advantage of a central sign on is that you can keep the same username/password across games.

    I've been beta testing the PS2 Online kit in the UK and it has been performing fantastically well. Very stable, fast and lots of fun.

    Arguments over who writes the better operating system, or provides SDK documentation are redundant since both companies offer this to third parties.

    The list of online games for both platforms also indicates third party development houses are being supported well. I hope we soon see an end to the highscore table as the token online feature.

    As always, it is content that will decide the battle. This should be an exciting time ahead for console players as the two giants pour money into providing the best online gaming experience.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.