Company Convinces Man To Tatoo His Head: Walking Billboards
from the welcome-to-the-past dept
Quick! Check the calendars. Is it 1999 again? Remember all the silly publicity stunts companies did back then? Remember how you could win money if you changed your name (or the name of your town) to that of a dot com? Then, there were those great Outpost.com commercials where they showed babies with "Outpost.com" tattoos on their forheads. It appears that hosting company CI Host has stolen that idea from Outpost.com (can Outpost.com - now owned by Fry's - sue?) and are paying some sucker to tattoo their logo on the back of his head for the next five years. He needs to leave it visible, and answer questions of anyone who asks him about it. I could only find the press release about it, so it's a bit biased. Oddly, the press release claims that there's been a ton of press coverage about this story, but I haven't seen any yet. The company claims that this stunt alone has raised traffic 12% and has been directly responsible for 23 new customers. I'm not sure I'd believe those stats. Update: As someone pointed out in a comment below, this paid-tattoo-advertising is becoming something of a trend.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
C I Host
I don't think many people who know much about this company would believe the stats either. http://www.webhostingtalk.com/ banned the name "C I Host" (and anything that remotely resembles it) from their forums due to the number of complaints posted to the board by disgruntled customers.
Complaints ranged from credit cards being billed after cancellations, repeatedly, to C I Host taking customers' money and then not even providing them with the service they paid for (and refunds were non-existent).
They also claimed to have something like 6 datacenters in the U.S. alone, with more all over the world (it was proved to be a false claim). WebHostingTalk.Com would still be full of posts from customers who signed up for a hosting plan that advertised free airplane tickets with a 12 month contract and then received nothing had it not been for a WHT admin banning the name.
I don't know of any other forums with posts about C I Host (I think a lot of them have followed WHT's lead) but go through C I Host's press releases and I'm sure you'll find a lot of "embellishments."
Josh
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: C I Host
-Ward
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Human Billboards
[ link to this | view in chronology ]