Apple's Me-Too (Plus) Music Service Launched
from the one-step-closer dept
In one of the worst kept secrets coming out of Apple in years, today they announced their own downloadable music service, with deals with each of the major record labels so that they have 200,000 songs to offer at $0.99/song. My initial reaction is that this is a step closer, but it's still not there yet. This is really a "me too" music downloading system, patterned on previous (failed) attempts to do the same thing with only minor improvements. First, the number of songs isn't nearly high enough (though, of course, that will improve), and the price is still too high. What the service does right is let people move the songs to an iPod (which you would expect, of course) and let people burn songs to a CD as many times as they want. The service is currently limited to Apple machines, but that will change with time. The bigger issue is that this absolutely takes away the benefits of offering music online. First, music sharing applications let people discuss, sample, share, and discover new music. Forcing people to pay $1/song doesn't encourage me to explore new music at all. Second, by making a distributed peer-to-peer system, distribution costs are dropped to next to nothing. So, this is a nice step for the music industry, but it's still missing the point. People are coming out saying that this will change the music industry - but I don't see that just yet. The only real "innovation" here (and it's incremental) is that you can burn the songs you download to CD.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
i agree...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Hopefully some artists will offer songs up for free so that consumer's can get an idea of what their music is about. But if your the Eagles, U2, Sheryl Crow, etc, everyone pretty much already knows what you're all about.
Another thing that apple could do with this service is allow musicians to offer songs for a charity and have the money directly deposit to support the charity instead of filtering through too many hands and coffers.
This could be big or just another small niche. Suspect most people will continue to take (can't bring myself to say steal) songs for Free where they can find them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
other stuff
Also, the files are in AAC - 128kbps file sounds better than a 192kbps mp3 in many tests.
It might be a pretty cool thing. $9.99/album isn't too bad either.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: other stuff
As for the price, 99c sounds pretty reasonable to me. I can't remember the last time I bought a CD that was actually at 99c a track or better (at least not in the States, back in Canada CDs are cheaper).
For someone like me, who's really not interested in downloading hundred's or even dozens of songs every week, but just one or two once in awhile as I think of them, this service seems like it will be really nice.
msykes
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
At Future Shop here in Canada we can walk in, pick any CD off the shelf and sit at booth's to listen to it. That HAS made me buy 2 or 3 more CD's than I intended when I first walked in... And although offline buying habits often do NOT correlate to online because the users intentions are different, I know there were some experiments with that online, using lower fidelity streaming albums. I assume the ratio of listeners-to-sales wasn't enough to recommend the practice elsewhere?
By the way Chris - download KaZaa Lite, and grab something like AdAware's spywatcher software, and join into this while you can before the RIAA puts 1/2 the country in jail.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]