Man Nabbed For Selling His Own Stolen Car Online
from the not-so-smart dept
Ah, the dumb criminals. In Germany, a man reported his car as stolen, and then proceeded to start auctioning off pieces of the same car online. He sold off the engine - but when he couldn't remove it from the car himself, decided to just throw in the rest of the car as well (what a deal!). The police say that they were going to stop him anyway for towing a car illegally. Now, here's the great part: the two men (the seller and the buyer) are now being held for receiving stolen goods. Is it still "receiving stolen goods" if the goods have only been reported stolen - but weren't actually stolen?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
classic pretzel logic from Mike!
I'm having a hard time actually believing that you asked this question. Of course it's receiving stolen goods -- the fact that he himself stole it does not change this fact. However, given Mike's constant support for the legions of music and software thieves -- as evidenced on several occasions in his long-winded editorials on this site -- it's not surprising that he wouldn't see what this German guy did as illegal!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: classic pretzel logic from Mike!
Also, I'm not sure how your comparison to file sharing relates to this story at all... You can mischaracterize my argument all you want, but all it does is show how much you don't understand what we're discussing here.
I do not support "music and software theives". I think any theivery is bad. I just question whether or not file sharing really is theivery - and I think it's a question that is very much open for debate. More to the point - my argument has nothing to do with those who participate in file sharing, but the companies who are yelling about "piracy" and "thievery" and blaming their customers. There's a real business model opportunity for them, and they've missed it.
But, you knew that already. You just like to troll.. don't you?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: classic pretzel logic from Mike!
The RIAA and MPAA are twisting words to make it sound worse and make it sound like they showed up for work one day and the warehouse was empty - "Oh no, someone stole all our stuff!". In reality, it's like someone broke in and copied all their documents and snuck back out. It's still illegal, just an entirely different crime.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: attempted receipt of stolen goods
So, the crime for the buyer (which requires knowledge as an element) would be attempted receipt of stolen property. This is the crime with which people are charged in sting operations of this type, where the goods aren't actually stolen. In most US jurisdictions, the penalties for attempt are almost the same as those for the completed crime (flavors of homicide being a notable exception).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]