Nano Suddenly A Gigantic Label

from the everything's-nano dept

When people first started talking about nanotechnology, they really were talking about building machines or robots at the molecular level. However, since the term has caught on (especially with those doling out the money) the the term nanotechnology is suddenly being applied to much broader scientific research. Someone I know who works at a "nanotechnology" company has always said that it's purely a marketing term. All the company really does is standard chemistry work. This seems to be going on in plenty of companies (and universities) that want a piece of the money allotted to "nanotechnology research". Of course, plenty of useful things are still likely to come out of this research, but it's nothing all that new. As for nanotech robots? "There's no real credible research in nanobots. Zero."
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 16 Jun 2003 @ 12:53pm

    No Subject Given

    Mork from Ork knew this one years ago:

    "Nano, Nano!"

    - AC

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Bob, 16 Jun 2003 @ 8:41pm

      No Subject Given

      There is. We're working on it here at MIT. Have been for years. Robots aren't quite nanolithic yet though. At the moment they're the size of air gun pelletes and they live in a vat of protein. Last year they were as large as golf balls. It's only a matter of time.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    mhh5, 16 Jun 2003 @ 10:34pm

    Nanobot research...

    I don't think that building nanobots like scaled-down cars is quite the right approach....
    Personally, I think "nanotechnologists" are missing out on doing fundamental research on self-assembly. People should learn from nature and how bacteria assemble themselves. Nature doesn't use lithography. Just my $0.02 worth....

    But really, who cares what you call it as long as you make useful stuff? :)

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.