Consumer Group Unveils Legislation Against RFID Chips
from the right-to-know dept
With all the recent hype about big-name companies embracing RFID chips, the discussion about privacy implications of widespread RFID has been muted. So, I guess it's no surprise that the proposal to create a "RFID Right to Know Act" hasn't gotten much attention. No doubt about it - RFID chips are incredibly useful, and I hope they get adopted quickly. However, there are some issues associated with them - and ignoring them doesn't make them go away. I would have no problem at all with the chips if people can get access to them and turn them off (or somehow reset them). Then the privacy implications go away and people get to start using them in useful ways (wouldn't it be nice to have an automated home inventory system - complete with location information?). So, the question is, do we need laws to make this come true, or is it something the market can take care of?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
Then again, with a house full of RFID chips hacked to send "chia pet" as their inventory information, your house would never be broken into. :)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
They need more info
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Lost Remote?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Comment on RFID Tags
there was a note of a family (I believe in Florida) that had such inserted into each person partly
due to the oldest family member being prone to getting lost. If such tags are required, then
any political thought that differs from the 'norm' becomes life threatening. Also last year was
the movie: "Minority Report" which envisioned a society with eye-scanning technology that
could identify anyone instantly. Currently that is difficult without links of optical bandwidth, but
such might eventually exist. The statement in another comment was that to read an RFID tag,
you had to be rather close. There exist two technologies that could put 'close' rather far away.
The first is RAMP (Raytheon Airborne Microwave Platform) which was a 1960s attempt to have
a microwave powered helicopter loft an RADAR to 100,000 feet. The other is the common
satellite dish with its low noise amplifier. With RAMP to power the RFID and an LNA to receive
the return 'close' can be far.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
RFID CHIPS
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: RFID CHIPS
They are being proposed to replace bar codes in retail establishments. Instead of a barcode being printed on that box of Cheerios, it would have this little chip, probably embedded in the card board.
An RFID reader sends out a pulse, which powers the RFID device, which then sends out any information programmed into it. In this case - Cheerios, $6.00. In this case (passive RFID), the reader would need to be less than three feet from the RFID chip.
The idea is that for inventory, instead of the stock person sitting there and scanning every box, he would stand in front of the Cheerios section and wave a wand, which would then tell him there were three dozen boxes there.
Again at check out, instead of the person physcially removing the item from the cart, finding the bar code, and then scanning it, you would pass by some wand that would ring up your total.
Just thing of these things as electronic bar codes.
These two examples save the retailers money (less time for stock tracking and ring-up, using less labor, etc.). So it is a real value - not technoogy for technology sake.
The issue with the protesters is that some stock boy will come into your home, get a three feet from the Cheerios and then with RFID technology be able to tell you have...Cheerios!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]