Netflix Granted Patent On DVD Rental Service
from the silly-obvious-patents dept
What is it with all the good e-commerce sites patenting the most obvious business models? Amazon has a history of patenting everything, and now we find out that Netflix has been granted a patent for their DVD subscription service. That's right. The idea that you can "subscribe" to a monthly service that will deliver DVDs to you is patentable, according to the US Patent and Trademark Office. Now, of course, Netflix will use this patent to try to fight off competition from Wal-Mart and Blockbuster - though, it's likely those company will try to fight the patent, pointing out that it's fairly obvious.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
IANAL, but...
Does anyone know when the patent was filed in relation to when they actually started advertising their service?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: IANAL, but...
The biggest threat would be "prior art" - anything that resembles the patent that is out there before you filed it - and as the article mentioned, anything "obvious" shouldn't get a patent in the first place.
I think finding "prior art" would be pretty easy in this case. It's not like there were no mail rental businesses before this company came along.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]