Why The Do Not Call List May Not Work
from the prior-business-relationship... dept
Peter Lewis over at Fortune.com is pointing out what might be the biggest loophole in the new federal "Do Not Call" list. First he lists all the various organizations that are exempted from the list. So, while you might think you're free from telemarketers, you're still open to receive calls from telephone companies, airlines, banks, insurance companies, charities, market research surveys, and (as discussed previously) politicians (for whom, it appears, no laws actually apply). That's quite a long list. How long until most telemarketers have some element of one of these categories? I can just see every telemarketer starting off with a "survey". More problematic, though, is the somewhat ambiguous "prior business relationship" loophole. As Lewis points out, companies receive your phone number within 24 hours, but don't need to remove it from their call list for 3 months. In other words, they have 3 months with which to do everything in their power to establish a "prior business relationship" with you. Of course, knowing how some of these guys work, they'll say that the fact that you (or your voicemail/answering machine) answered the phone when they called now constitutes a prior business relationship. I'll be interested to hear any stories about whether or not anyone who signed up for the list discovers that they're getting more calls in the time leading up to when the telemarketers need to honor their requests. Update: According to plenty of people the guy at Fortune is very very wrong about the various exemptions.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
http://www.cnn.com/2003/ALLPOLITICS/06/27/do.not.call.ap/index.html
"The FCC voted 5-0 Thursday to add its authority to the do-not-call list and to plug holes in its protections. The registry will now also block telemarketers from industries whose calls the FCC regulates, including airlines, banks and telephone companies.
The FCC action also covers faxes and calls made from within a state -- the FTC could only police interstate calls."
Also...
http://www.donotcall.gov/FAQ/FAQConsumers.aspx#Exceptions
"Q: What about telephone surveys?
A: If the call is really for the sole purpose of conducting a survey, it is not covered. Only telemarketing calls are covered – that is, calls that solicit sales of goods or services. Callers purporting to take a survey, but also offering to sell goods or services, must comply with the National Do Not Call Registry."
Callers purporting to take a survey and then attempt to sell you something are still susceptible to the 11,000 per call fine.
:)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Why The Do Not Call List May Not Work
I can see a booming business where sham companies are set up in the U.S. to obtain the list and then they turn around and sell the list to telemarketers in some Caribbean country.
!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Delete/modify this 100% wrong story
FCC info proving this article is bogus
International calls are covered, it's just hard to enforce it if a company is located completely off-shore. A U.S. based company is not going to be able to use this method, because the FCC can fine them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]