The Only Way To Can The Spam

from the anonymity-is-for-suckers dept

Business Week takes on the challenge of dissecting every proposed spam solution and pointing out why it will fail. It's a good summary of many of the (mostly half-assed) proposals to end spam. They come to the conclusion that the only way to really prevent spam is to authenticate every email with a special digital signature, so that it can be tracked. The problem, of course, is there are plenty of good reasons why people might want to be anonymous online. The writer suggests that ISPs should make it much easier to encrypt any message, such that it can still be authenticated, but no one - except those who its intended for - can read it. That solves some of the problems but not all. There still may be situations where you want more complete anonymity, in which case there should be some sort of opening for fully anonymous email. However, to prevent spam, perhaps any such anonymous email system should be limited in the number of messages it can send out at any particular time.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    aNonMooseCowherd, 8 Jul 2003 @ 9:39pm

    No Subject Given

    The best solution is to make the sender pay. Or rather, offer users the option of receiving no-pay SMTP email or sender-pays email through a new protocol. The BW article says this will cause spammers to exploit more poorly-configured mail servers. Well, that should be a good incentive for sysadmins not to run open mail relays.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.