Bad Patents Go International

from the bad-news dept

We've had plenty of stories about ridiculous patents in the US, which are usually based on a blatantly obvious idea, and then used by a "licensing company" who doesn't actually produce anything, to try to suck money out of companies that are actually adding something to the economy. It appears those sorts of patent scams also happen internationally. A Canadian company that claims to have patents on calculating a shipping cost and/or offering options to buy with different currencies is now threatening small e-commerce sites in New Zealand. They're also trying to double bill by threatening any ISP that hosts any of these e-commerce sites, saying they also need to pay up. When will governments figure out that a patent system that allows this sort of activity is actively discouraging real innovation? They're encouraging wasteful patent filings and useless legal activity, while slowing down the ability for companies to actually get innovative products into the market. Update: Upon reading this someone just emailed me a very good New Yorker article explaining why business model patents are bad. Basically, the argument is that competition is good for everyone. Patents slow down competition, and thus, slow down innovation. Business model patents are particularly bad, because they're just patenting a concept - and not an actual "thing". A good read.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Beck, 8 Jul 2003 @ 11:44am

    Legalized Monopoly?

    What is the difference between a business process patent and a monopoly?
    If AT&T had patented the "business process" of routing interstate phone calls from the caller to the destination then they would have been able to legally lock out competitors and would never have been split up.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.