Spam Shuts Down Legitimate Websites
from the due-process-doesn't-matter dept
Yet another article talking about the draconian measures taken by the anti-spam crowd in their efforts to stop spam. It talks about an ISP that feels compelled to shut down legitimate websites because anti-spam forces declare them as spammers. The anti-spammers, of course, say that it's the only way they can stop spam and that no one is forced to use their blacklists. However, as it's increasingly becoming a necessity to use some sort of blacklist, many website owners and ISPs feel the blacklist maintainers are taking things too far. They don't give any sort of "due process" to let those accused of spamming defend themselves. There are plenty of cases of "false positives", where someone forgets they opted-in to a mailing list, or someone who shares an email address with a spouse and doesn't realize what the other person has signed up for. Most ISPs seem willing to get rid of actual spammers - but are a bit worried when they feel compelled by anti-spam forces to cut off those they feel are doing business legitimately. Doesn't this seem like an opportunity for someone to create a better blacklist that actually does involve some sort of "due process"? If it were true that many legit websites are being victimized without this, then a better blacklist would become widely adopted very quickly, and the others would fade away.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
IronPort solution to spam
http://www.ironport.com/
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: IronPort solution to spam
Their spam 'solution' is very close to the DMA's idea of how email should be, free for all members to send in whatever volume they like until the consumer cries 'Uncle.'
With the DMA and Microsoft (and probably Ironport) pushing hard for a federal law that would allow advertisers to keep sending you email without first getting your permission, it is clear that other solutions are needed to protect ISPs and consumers from the continuing onslaught.
Stephen
www.cobb.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: IronPort solution to spam
I realize AOL could pound me under, but you see I know there is a God and they will get theirs one day...
When I went to answer their email proclaiming they would refuse to forward any mail from each of two of my domains they bounced back... sounds like something a spammer would do...
Mike
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Better Blacklist
Funny how this article, linked from fatcow.com's web site, has a different story:click here
Specifically, there is no mention of fatcow having to disconnect a legitimate customer.
The link you pointed to says :Some legitimate websites, those that aren't breaking any laws but cannot afford to hire lawyers and defend themselves, are becoming nomads, going from ISP to ISP over the course of a year, forced to move because of illegitimate spam complaints.
This is a statement without any facts backing it up.
The "better blacklist" exists, and it's run by spews.org. I am not connected with them, but from watching their behavior since inception, it's clear that they use bait email addresses to identify spam, so the issue of false positives is gone. They fall into your "draconian" category, but once again, it's only after ignoring complaints that an ISP ends up on the block list.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Response to Mike's note re "spam shuts down legiti
I want to hear from other people who've had the same thing happen. Email to classaction@teamdoubleclick.com.
It may take some time but I'm going to put together a group of people who share similar stories, find a lawyer willing to file a class action suit and start working toward getting this fixedl. Like you said - it's gone too far!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]