Libraries Cancel Meeting On Porn Filters
from the no-legitimacy dept
This one is curious. The American Library Association, who had been planning a meeting with various filtering companies to press their demands for more open filtering tools, has now cancelled the meeting. No reason was given, but people say it's because the ALA didn't want to give any sense of "legitimacy" to the filter companies. Now, it's no secret that I'm no fan of filtering companies, but I don't see how this meeting does anything bad. The filtering companies are legitimate companies, and some libraries may want to use their technology. Ignoring them doesn't solve the issue.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Precisely who is legitimate?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Precisely who is legitimate?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Precisely who is legitimate?
I'm still confused as to why they wouldn't do this. As far as I'm concerned, they should have this meeting and discuss with the filter providers what they would expect out of a filter.
I still think it should be the library's own choice whether or not to include a filter, but I don't see what damage is done by meeting with the filtering companies.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Precisely who is legitimate?
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Precisely who is legitimate?
[ link to this | view in thread ]