Pentagon Prepares A Futures Market On Terror Attacks
from the bizarre dept
dkan24 writes in to express his disbelief with a report in the NY Times that the Pentagon is working on a futures market for terrorist attacks. Speculators would get to bet on the likelihood of terrorist attacks, assassinations and coups. The program would apparently also fall under the control of everyone's favorite former disgraced national security advisor, John Poindexter. The Pentagon claims that this will help them predict events. This sounds so absolutely ridiculous that even the Senators who spoke out against it say they can't convince most people it isn't a hoax. The Pentagon admitted it was true, but downplayed it, and has already (as they've been known to do) taken much info about it offline. The idea was that futures markets often reveal "hidden" information about events that are going to happen, because people who know stuff will end up betting in their favor. If you boil it down, it looks like (since the system was supposed to be anonymous), they were hoping that terrorists who planned to do something would sign up, and bet in favor of their planned attack. Just think how nice it will be when you can look online and see the odds of someone killing you. There's really no way to point out just how bizarre this plan really is. To make it even better, the organization running it, called the Policy Analysis Market, is proud to state that by trading in information about future terrorist attacks, they might even make the government a nice little profit. Update: As expected, following the blast of negative publicity, this morning they've announced that the system will be scrapped.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Missed the Boat, Mike
Another way of thinking about it is to let people put their money where their mouth is, and those that do have a more thorough analysis will be more accurate on their futures placement.
Instapundit has a good analysis - much better than your knee-jerk response. Another way to think of it is that we are in a new era and trying this idea won't hurt anyone. I believe the $8 million proposed on the program is spent every nanosecond in D.C.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Missed the Boat, Mike
However, from a perception standpoint, this is a terrible thing for the government to get involved in. It suggests that they're giving incentive for terrorist attacks. If you stand to get rich off a terrorist attack are you going to do everything possible to prevent it?
It turns tragedy into a (for profit) game, and that has dangerous consequences beyond just an increased information gathering tool.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Missed the Boat, Mike
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Private vs. Gov't
What if the government financed the following poll: "Do you think there will be a terrorist attack on government soil in the next 12 months?" Would anyone have heart palpatations over a poll? The government pays for polls all the time (Clinton's use of almost daily polls while in office is well documented - and taxpayers paid for them, many branches of gov't do their own polls, etc.?)
The futures market is a poll where people back up their opinions with cold, hard cash. I think people might think harder about what they predict if they had money riding on it. Think of it this way.
One thing I do agree with - they could have done this through Iowa or done it without announcing anything and gotten away with it. How many contraversal gov't programs are done every day without anyone saying "boo" about them?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Terrorism Futures
What sort of odds are there on having a terrorist act within the next month, much less the next 12 months? I'd think they'd both be pretty close to 1 to 1, as the RIAA/MPAA/IPR-CROWD still exists and is still allowed to opperate with impunity.
Once the RIAA/MPAA/IPR-CROWD goes away, terrorism will be a lot less frequent, and only done by middle eastern fanatics and nazis from Michigan.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Terrorism Futures
[ link to this | view in chronology ]