Pac Bell Sues Over Online Music Tracking
from the good-for-them dept
Pac Bell (who I had thought was SBC now, but apparently, they still occasionally go by Pac Bell) is suing the music industry, questioning the methods they're using in trying to track down file sharers. Specifically, they're saying that the subpoenas were filed incorrectly. They were filed from the wrong jurisdiction and were requesting info on multiple users on a single subpoena - something Pac Bell says is too broad and not allowed under the law. Furthermore, they make the claim that, as a service provider, they really have nothing to do with people sharing music. Interestingly, they ask to make this a jury trial, suggesting they believe that a jury will rule against the music industry for their heavy handedness. This sounds like they're basically making the same complaints that a few universities made in refusing to give up names. However, instead of just withholding names, they're actually suing back.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Finally
Or, if we want to be really jaded, we could say that we know that SBC, which sells DSL at a pretty hefty mark-up, knows that music downloading has been one of the "killer aps" for people upgrading from 56K modems (along with porn, ofcourse). By making music swapping easier, demand for broadband increases and SBC benefits.
I vote on the first analysis (cost savings) over the second (increasing revenue). Either case, I would try to follow the money.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Pretty much the only reason people get broadband is to download large amounts of data on P2P.
Why bother upgrading from 56k if the evil MPAA/RIAA sue you for using your bandwidth?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Maybe in your small, insignificant world, but I have broadband and the only reason I have it is to quell the intense pain I get when loading Techdirt via 56k modem takes 20 minutes. Speed for Nerds. That is why Cox gets my $30 a month, so I can get a quick hit of speed after a long day in an office with 100mBps (or more) thoroughput to the internet.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Munich gets it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Munich gets it...
In the original issue of the RIAA practices, perhaps the political backlash has started:
Coleman launches inquiry into RIAA's piracy crackdown
Associated Press
WASHINGTON - Sen. Norm Coleman on Thursday began an inquiry into the recording industry's copyright lawsuits against online music swappers, saying the tactics could ensnare innocent people.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Munich gets it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Munich gets it...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]