Pac Bell Sues Over Online Music Tracking

from the good-for-them dept

Pac Bell (who I had thought was SBC now, but apparently, they still occasionally go by Pac Bell) is suing the music industry, questioning the methods they're using in trying to track down file sharers. Specifically, they're saying that the subpoenas were filed incorrectly. They were filed from the wrong jurisdiction and were requesting info on multiple users on a single subpoena - something Pac Bell says is too broad and not allowed under the law. Furthermore, they make the claim that, as a service provider, they really have nothing to do with people sharing music. Interestingly, they ask to make this a jury trial, suggesting they believe that a jury will rule against the music industry for their heavy handedness. This sounds like they're basically making the same complaints that a few universities made in refusing to give up names. However, instead of just withholding names, they're actually suing back.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    munich, 31 Jul 2003 @ 8:40am

    Finally

    Someone with deep pockets fights back. Not that SBC/Pac Bell cares about the consumer (I have SBC and am not a huge fan of them), but I think SBC is fighting this action to prevent a precedent where SBC ends up with whole teams of people serving subpoenas from the music, movie, etc. industries.

    Or, if we want to be really jaded, we could say that we know that SBC, which sells DSL at a pretty hefty mark-up, knows that music downloading has been one of the "killer aps" for people upgrading from 56K modems (along with porn, ofcourse). By making music swapping easier, demand for broadband increases and SBC benefits.

    I vote on the first analysis (cost savings) over the second (increasing revenue). Either case, I would try to follow the money.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 31 Jul 2003 @ 8:47am

    No Subject Given

    I agree totally with munich.

    Pretty much the only reason people get broadband is to download large amounts of data on P2P.

    Why bother upgrading from 56k if the evil MPAA/RIAA sue you for using your bandwidth?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      LittleW0lf, 31 Jul 2003 @ 10:10am

      Re: No Subject Given

      Pretty much the only reason people get broadband is to download large amounts of data on P2P.

      Maybe in your small, insignificant world, but I have broadband and the only reason I have it is to quell the intense pain I get when loading Techdirt via 56k modem takes 20 minutes. Speed for Nerds. That is why Cox gets my $30 a month, so I can get a quick hit of speed after a long day in an office with 100mBps (or more) thoroughput to the internet.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    KevinK, 31 Jul 2003 @ 10:35am

    Munich gets it...

    SBC does not do anything unless it makes Ed Whitacre a wealthier man... For example SBC has decided to cut costs by eliminating bottled water for employees, they force managers to work 12+ hour days and they are required to work holidays, I mean really it is a wonderful company. Oh and if a customer moves locations they immediately send your account to collections because they have found that some companies do not pay their bills promptly during a relocation- they don't wait until the bill is due they automatically assume everyone is out to screw them, the list is never ending. And please when do we get competition on DSL rates???

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Munich, 31 Jul 2003 @ 11:52am

      Re: Munich gets it...

      Thanks Kevin. My favorite comment you have is "when will we get competition on DSL rates". I pay something like $65/month for SBC DSL and have my friends with cable modems laughing at me (I have satellite and don't want to hook up cable to my home just for internet).

      In the original issue of the RIAA practices, perhaps the political backlash has started:

      Coleman launches inquiry into RIAA's piracy crackdown
      Associated Press

      WASHINGTON - Sen. Norm Coleman on Thursday began an inquiry into the recording industry's copyright lawsuits against online music swappers, saying the tactics could ensnare innocent people.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Jack Ass, 31 Jul 2003 @ 2:53pm

        Re: Munich gets it...

        It's a sad state of affairs when you find yourself rooting for the local baby bell. Or worse yet, when the baby bell who is by it's very nature pure evil, is defending your rights against satan himself. I would think it were funny if it wearen't so sad.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          jeff, 25 Jul 2004 @ 4:36pm

          Re: Munich gets it...

          Excuse me, but the last time i checked the phone bill was absolutely the cheapest bill I pay. The increase in basic telephone service has been so minimal over the years that u can still get basic phone service in most areas for 18.00 bucks. Hell i can barely get my car washed for 18.00 bucks anymore. And this big mark up in DSL where does that come from ,well that comes from someone who thinks dsl is just basically a modem over an exissing phone line. Well quiet the contrary ,the phone company has spent 10's of billions for DSL. Dslams to serve every 100 people cost $100,00.00 Also when dsl first came out the modems bell gave to their customers cost bell 500.00 a piece. DSL has not been a money maker for anyone. iT will probably be another 10 years before they see any profits.

          link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.