New Software Tracks Who Knows Whom
from the is-that-a-good-thing?? dept
I've made my opinions on things like Friendster well known before. I think they're fads that won't last (whatever happened to sixdegrees.com, anyway?). However, even while the Friendster hype continues, some people are starting to notice other, though more technically advanced companies, like Spoke Software and Visible Path, are trying to create a similar thing for businesses. The difference here (unlike something like LinkedIn, which does use the Friendster model) is that these other companies try to establish links automatically by watching what you do all day, and how quickly people respond to your emails and instant messages and such. On the face of it, these products sound useful - and I certainly know sales people who would find it very valuable to know that someone else at their company happens to play tennis every other Saturday with a big shot at an account he's trying to close. However, there's a big problem with these types of products: the people who have the really valuable information don't want to let it out. People who have a valuable rolodex know it's valuable. Giving it up is not something they're inclined to do. Someone mentioned to me that these sorts of products are useful for a young sales person trying to get established, but very few senior execs are going to want to give up that kind of data - and without that kind of data, the system loses its value quickly. It's the problem of any system that is trying to more evenly allocate data that previously was hoarded. There's a reason people hoard that data, and others are so desperate to get it. The article even quotes someone who says that people may start keeping two sets of email accounts - one that can be watched, and the real one that is kept secret from prying eyes.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
Perhaps with a free market approach there would be some financial incentive for those with the information to share it. Likewise, there would need to be some associated cost with those who want to exploit the information. For those somewhere in the middle of their career hypothetically these two elements would balance out to $0.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Relationships are owned by individuals
You are right, the idea of shared contacts has been tried 100's of times in large enterprises. It does not work becuase it expects people to share outside the way they do it now. Relationship be definition can not be used by someone with the relationship owner providing assistance.
The research also shows that networking is not a zero sum game. In fact the most effective and powerful users of networks focus on getting people introduced to thier connections..becuase they know that build relationships. Spoke has found that the more "connected" a person the more comfortable they are with the system.
http://www.inc.com/magazine/20030101/25049.html
[ link to this | view in chronology ]