Email Doesn't Bring Us Any Closer Together
from the still-six-degrees-of-separation dept
Apparently, email doesn't bring the world any closer together. Some researchers decided to repeat the famous "six degrees of separation" study, where people were asked to try to contact someone else at random, by going through people they knew. On average, it turned out, that there were six degrees of separation between any two random people. The new experiment tried to see if that result changes as a result of the internet and email. The results showed that, even with email there's still an average of six degrees of separation. The study also discovered some other interesting findings about what sorts of people were best to contact. Very few people used "internet only" friends (which probably explains why there's no difference when done over email). Starting with people you knew at work seemed to yield better results. Also (oddly) when contacting members of the same sex, there were higher success rates. The most interesting point, though, was that most people didn't rely on "social hubs". There's been plenty of research about the importance of social hubs in social networks, but this research suggests they might not matter as much as people think. If you think about it, this makes sense. If you're asked to contact someone specifically, you're always going to think of the specific individual who might know that type of person best. Falling back on the "social hub" that you know is sort of an "I give up" position. It means you can't think of someone specialized enough to perhaps know the person in question, so you might as well try the shotgun approach and hope the social hub has a better idea of the target person.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
couldn't they have tried that on friendster?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: couldn't they have tried that on friendster?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
What about six degrees of hate?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Six degrees of Sep - VERY BAD STUDY
In particular, people may be less likely to know whom their email contacts are in email contact with, than whom their friends are friends with, so how can they guess efficiently how to get an email from person X to person Y?
A better experiment would be to monitor a few billions of pieces of email, make lists of senders and recipients, and calculate how the minimum degrees that separate every possible pair of them.
- The Precision Blogger
precision-blogging.blogspot.com
[ link to this | view in chronology ]