Build Your Own Power Plant

from the for-the-DIY-guy-in-you dept

Fri, Aug 22nd 2003 12:04pm — Mike Masnick

Last week's blackout apparently has created a lot more interest in figuring out to build your own power plant and stop relying on utility owned power. Already, apparently 8% of the power in the US is supplied from such "distributed" power plants. This goes beyond just having a generator, but in having a self-contained power plant. Of course, most of those investing in self-owned power plants are large companies, but it's nice to think of the possibility of bringing it down to the local level. Think of it as WiFi hotspots for power...

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

6 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Ed Halley, 22 Aug 2003 @ 1:09pm

No Subject Given
The prime benefit to centralized electrical generation is to centralize the pollution. If you reduce pollution in a plant by 1%, that's 1% immediately for all regional users. Conversely, distributed generation is only improved at the whim of the individual owners, much like automobile pollution. How many 1980s "antiques" are still on the road?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- mhh5, 23 Aug 2003 @ 11:16pm
  
  Re: No Subject Given
  Hmm. 1) I'm not sure "centralized pollution" is actually a benefit, and it costs a lot to upgrade one big power plant. 2) If you live in CA, all cars made after 1970 must pass a minimum smog test, so presumably, decentralized power plants could be held to the same kind of standards or have their operating licenses revoked.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
dorpus, 24 Aug 2003 @ 11:42pm

What about distribution capacity?
On a more mundane level, I read over on Slashdot a few days ago about the electronic problems associated with having decentralized power generation systems. Even with centralized generation, we do have a complex system of high-powered lines and transformers, vulnerable to choke points.

[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Paul Jardine, 28 Sep 2006 @ 5:52am

Wrong question, wrong answer
I don't think the issue is with generating power, it's with storage.
Take the IP world where there is streaming video, and stuff you download. If I can store power locally for later usage and 'bit-torrent' it down to my local storage, then peer-to-peer power supply is a definite possibility.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
frank, 29 Jun 2008 @ 11:36am

home built power plant
it can be done..theres a componie called EEStor. who claims to have produced a new batery that will replace all we have and be the answere to any problem relateing baytery storage.and the rest ime not going to elabarate on.its not rockit science and if one would educate them selves on all the new /old ways of skinning a cat .think out of the box.and allso think beond large componies holding your life in bondage by owning your sorce of power.this would free up the plants we allreddy have to deal with large catastrofic disasters witch are going to happen. i think i said enough.its more then possable ,the only rezistance we will have is big money not wanting to let go of its strangle hold on the american people ,the verry thing thats been holding us back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Rakhitha Karunarathne, 14 Aug 2008 @ 8:58pm

Centralizing the pollution has many advantages.
1. You can move the pollution to a area that minimizes the impact.

2. Some of the pollutants can be collected, managed, used commercially when they are produced in large quantities.

3. Also upgrading a one large plant actually cost less than upgrading million smaller plants. (most of the time)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]