Some Numbers On The Costs Of Spam
from the that's-all? dept
I've seen some similar studies before, but it's always interesting to note new numbers. A new study on just how much the spam problem costs businesses calculates the cost as being $874 per employee. Of course, this number seems to be based on an awful lot of assumptions, so I wouldn't put much weight on it. Instead, it's probably better to look at the hard facts the research dug up, such as the fact that the average worker receives 13.3 spam emails a day (that's it?!?) and spends 6.5 minutes managing the spam. Of course, I wonder how they define "managing the spam" also. If I miss an important email because it gets lost in the daily spam purge, how do you calculate the "cost" or even the "time lost" of that?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
My counts
Every Friday at the close of business I scan through the list of e-mails looking for any non-SPAM messages (due to the way our e-mail network handles internal e-mail addresses they are very easy to pick out of the list). I then clear the folder and start fresh for the next week.
It's still 3.5 hours short of close of business on Friday, but I currently have 292 messages in that folder, or an average of 58.4 messages per working day which is an average of 7.3 messages per working hour.
I must be special.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No spam at work
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No spam at work
This is more a result of not being a large enough target than anything else. I have never used my work address (though I have used one of my client's work address) for anything other than work related email between myself and other employees, and the fact that I work for a large fortune 100 company means that the spammers have gotten very creative about finding all of our email addresses. The one that I used to post a bugtraq message years ago receives maybe 3 or 4 emails a week compared to my work one which I've never used for anything other than interoffice communication.
I even have accounts on my ISP that I've never used, period, which have 100s of SPAM messages sent a week. The fact that the ISP is very promiscuous with the email lists has something to do with it, but the size of the target has as much to do with being targeted as the user's personal habits.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No spam at work
I have a significantly faster PC at home and with my cable modem all to myself, my internet connectivity is much more responsive at home, plus I don't have filters blocking a majority of websites at home, either.
I've also noticed that approx. 1/3 - 1/2 of all the SPAM I receive is sent to multiple recipients within the company, so I suspect that someone somewhere got their hands on a corporate e-mail directory. It's funny because our corporate e-mail system uses firstname.lastname@companyname.com and so often times I can tell it's SPAM just by seeing 'JOHN.SMITH we have an exciting offer for you' in the subject line.
For some reason one of the guys at our Puerto Rica location seems to be the name most often to appear in the subject line... I wonder why?
2 hours to quitting time and current count is 298 SPAM.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No spam at work
Because his name falls at the break that most mass emailers use to break SPAM into smaller chunks that won't as easily be filtered by the servers as SPAM, and your company has a low turn-over rate?
The usual way they find a list is by using brute force algorithms, sending email using common names to a company, then filtering out all the bad ones while keeping the good ones. They also find lists through the web, or via LDAP.
Cox has a very high turnover rate apparently, because my email address often bounces around in the cutpoints, sometimes I'm on the last of the list, sometimes I'm the first, and most of the time I'm in between. Just the way it is.
However, spamassassin works great, and I cannot see ever living without it.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No spam at work
[ link to this | view in thread ]
spam filtering
[ link to this | view in thread ]