To Be Or Not To Be Transhumanist
from the playing-with-fire-or-making-life-better? dept
Toronto's Globe and Mail is running a written debate (which is apparently a prelude to a live debate) between a medical ethicist and a transhumanist over whether or not we should be doing everything possible to extend our lives. The medical ethicist suggests that what the transhumanists want to do is making us less human (which I'm not sure the transhumanists would disagree with). Her general fear is that they will go "too far". The transhumanist responds with a series of examples of other technology and medical breakthroughs that have made our lives better - and saying that if the opportunity is there, shouldn't we take it? No matter what the debate on the topic is, it's not going to stop people from researching ways to extend our lives - so shouldn't we be more focused on making sure we understand and are prepared for the consequences of that research, rather than worrying whether or not it should be done at all?
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Cultural Advantages?
1. religion is not a big deal, and
2. there are too many people anyway
if we make advances in organ transplant technology, could China turn into the world's meat grinder?
There are anecdotal reports of people undergoing personality changes after receiving transplants. It's hypothesized that latent viruses do affect our personality, hence transplanted organs innoculate us. We've found viruses that cause schizophrenia or other mental disorders, so it's no surprise if there are other viruses that cause subtler changes, e.g. really liking the color green.
I wonder if we could have a second generation of biological weapons that induce mass personality changes?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Guess it depends on your perspective
[ link to this | view in chronology ]