Study Confuses Online Content And Services... Again

from the not-quite-the-same-thing dept

Yet another misleading study has come out talking about how online users are increasingly willing to pay for content online. The problem is, the study doesn't distinguish between "content" and "services" - and, in fact, the biggest single category of "content" they claim people paid for were online dating services. That's not content. That's a service. In fact, for most online dating services the "content" itself is free - it's the connecting (the service) that costs money. It would be interesting to see how many people are actually paying for content online - but that's not what this study shows - and suggesting it does is misleading.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 24 Sep 2003 @ 9:21am

    I will NEVER pay for content!

    Ever!

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    westpac, 24 Sep 2003 @ 11:09am

    must be unique

    Online content must be unique and relevant if someone is going to pay money for it. I have subscribed to various sites at various times to sites that offered unique and to me valuable content. But if it's something that can be obtained for free elsewhere on the internet (or on TV) no one is going to pay for it. There's too much free content out there, even porn.

    What needs to be done is to create a new ad revenue model for the internet. Click-throughs were annoying as hell and so are pop-ups. Banner ads aren't too bad and if companies use them to build brand recognition they should call that acceptable. When I see a commercial on TV I don't run out to the store, so why should a company expect me to click on a banner ad just because I saw it on a website?

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.