If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Phoenix City Council Says PD Can Have Surveillance Drones Without Any Policy In Place Because Some Officers Recently Got Shot
- New Right To Repair Bill Targets Obnoxious Auto Industry Behavior
- Former Employees Say Mossad Members Dropped By NSO Officers To Run Off-The-Books Phone Hacks
- San Francisco Cops Are Running Rape Victims' DNA Through Criminal Databases Because What Even The Fuck
- Clearview Pitch Deck Says It's Aiming For A 100 Billion Image Database, Restarting Sales To The Private Sector
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
huh 'page not found'?
How is 'page not found' correct?
Is it not *MORE* correct to say 'cannot resolve host'? Or how about: whatever.blah.name.com could not be found. Please check the name and try again.
Why ask for more broken behavior of 'page not found'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: huh 'page not found'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: huh 'page not found'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: huh 'page not found'?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: huh 'page not found'?
update your bind server to turn all requests which return the IP address of sitefinder to return NXDOMAIN instead. Restores "correct" behavior. More difficult to implement.
Hack version 2:
Have a local override for the IP address of sitefinder which actually points at your own service or google. Trivial (I think) to implement.
Personally, I'm still impressed with the number of referrals I've been getting from sitefinder. Currently, its third behind Google and Yahoo.
Brandon
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
To stop this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: To stop this
[ link to this | view in chronology ]