Study Shows That RIAA's Evidence May Be Unreliable

from the oops dept

While the RIAA has made a big of show of telling people that it's impossible to hide from their hired copyright sniffing robots, a new report suggests that it's really not that hard to fake peer-to-peer requests to make it look as though a different machine has the files in question. In other words, this sort of thing could explain how someone could be wrongly accused by the RIAA and also calls the quality of their "your IP address identifies you" legal argument into question. Of course, using this argument seems like a bit of a stretch, and seems in the same vein as folks blaming tax fraud on trojans (though, that argument worked). Still, based on this, I wonder if someone could write a file sharing system that specifically generated incorrect information to throw off sniffers? I'm not saying that this is recommended, but from the beginning, we've been saying that all these actions by the RIAA are only going to serve to push file sharers deeper underground. The end result? The recording industry has a ton of really pissed off customers (some of whom will boycott the industry) and people are still sharing music. It seems to make a lot more sense to try to come up with reasonable business models that support unrestricted file sharing, instead of a costly legal route that will do nothing but anger your best customers.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 2 Oct 2003 @ 7:54am

    I've said all along...

    ...the solution to the overzelious subpena problem is spoofing the source address of udp packets.

    Users who's IPSs block spoofed packets will soon upgrade and the InterWeb will return to its chaotic normal of routing around damage.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Precision Blogger, 2 Oct 2003 @ 9:15am

    Shooting Fish in a Barrel

    The trouble here is that when the RIAA sends a subpeona or threat to some random computer owner by mistake, the odds are high that they've got copies of copyright-music on their hard drive anyway.

    During prohibition, if police could have randomly administered alcohol tests they would have gotten an awful lot of positive hits too.
    - The Precision Blogger
    precision-blogging.blogspot.com

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.