SunnComm Sues Student Who Discovered Shift Key Copy Protection Workaround

from the the-DMCA-in-action dept

It was just three days ago that a student at Princeton made all sorts of news for discovering that the new copy protection system from SunnComm - being used on new CDs from BMG - had a pretty gaping hole: the copy protection could be defeated by holding down the shift key. Instead of taking this information and thanking the student for his free research into how their copy protection system was incredibly weak, SunnComm has decided to sue Alex Halderman for revealing that information, saying it was (of course!) a violation of the anti-circumvention rule of the DMCA. They say that their market value has collapsed because of the paper - but Halderman says he isn't worried. He points out: "I don't think telling people to press the 'Shift' key is a violation of the DMCA." Of course, the irony in all of this is that Halderman's graduate adviser is Ed Felten, the man the RIAA threatened to sue when he tried to present a paper showing how to break SDMI, an earlier copy protection scheme. After the publicity surrounding that threat, the RIAA insisted they were kidding, and it was insane to think they would ever sue a professor for presenting such a paper... Update: Another article on the suit suggests they may sue him for "maligning the company's reputation". I'm confused how it's maligning the company's reputation if it's true.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    aNonMooseCowherd, 9 Oct 2003 @ 4:19pm

    SLAPP laws

    Some states have anti-SLAPP laws designed just for cases like this. The article doesn't say whether the company is threatening to sue in state or federal court.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  2. identicon
    LittleW0lf, 9 Oct 2003 @ 5:23pm

    Turning off "Auto-Run" Feature

    I wonder if turning off the "Auto-Run" feature under Windows, using the standard tools provided by Microsoft (regedit or UIeditor), also defeats this mechanism, since pressing "Shift" temporarily disables auto-run. C2Tool in SDK might do it too.

    I did this as a security fix, since I don't like software automatically installing itself on my system without permission (with all the keylogging, identity theiving folks out there, you cannot be too careful,) but then again, I don't have too many Windoze machines to worry about anyway.

    Oops, now I may have violated the DMCA. See how easy it is to do kids? I'll wait for the cops to show up at my door.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  3. identicon
    AMetamorphosis, 10 Oct 2003 @ 7:48am

    Different perspective

    I certainly sympathize with this person who is being sued but in the long run, perhaps this will expose how absolutely absurd the DMCA really is. I mean seriously, ... getting sued for telling people that the Shift key allows someone to get around the supposed copy protection ? ! ? How is something like this construed as violating the DMCA ? If its that damn easy to circumvent then perhaps it will help to show that this whole issue has been blown out of proportion. I would think even the least computer literate judge could understand this.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  4. identicon
    AMetamorphosis, 10 Oct 2003 @ 8:36am

    More information

    I found this over @ MSNBC and thought it was informative seeing that it was mentioned in a previous post:
    " In his paper, published on the Princeton Web site on Monday, the student explained that the SunnComm technique relies on installing antipiracy software directly from the protected CD itself. However, this can be prevented by stopping Microsoft Windows’ “auto-run” feature. That can be done simply by pushing the Shift key as the CD loads. If the CD does load and installs the software, Halderman identified the driver file that can be disabled using standard Windows tools. "

    link to this | view in thread ]

  5. identicon
    mikes, 10 Oct 2003 @ 8:56am

    challenge to the dmca

    I can only see the legal orgy that is DMCA cases like this serving the end of the misguided act. As AM said, it's just so absurd, it's got to be struck down.

    Fact is he is telling us how to circumvent a copyright protection device, which is illegal and hevaily fined under the DMCA.

    link to this | view in thread ]

  6. identicon
    mikes, 10 Oct 2003 @ 9:11am

    SunnComm backs off!

    No intentions to sue! Guess that solves that one. Good job SunnComm!!

    link to this | view in thread ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.