Conflict Of Interest Over NYT Valenti Profile, Valenti Resists Lawsuit Strategy

from the you-would-think-the-NYTimes-would-be-more-careful... dept

With all the trouble the NY Times has had in the past year with just how honest they're being with the public, you would think they'd be bending over backwards to avoid anything that might look bad. It doesn't look that way. A couple weeks ago they ran a puff piece about Jack Valenti and how he was "at the top of his game" - which seemed a little odd to many folks who consider Valenti anything but. Ernest Miller points to Mickey Kaus slamming the NY Times for the piece, pointing out that the writer of the piece is married to the head of Sony Pictures - and, thus, is one of Valenti's "bosses". Unfortunately, it appears there's no permanent link to the Kaus piece (unless I'm missing something...) so it will scroll of the page eventually. Still, you would think there's quite a big conflict in having that guy write the piece. As, Kaus says: "Suppose a New York Times reporter were married to the owner of a major league baseball team. Would the Times let that reporter cover the Commissioner of Baseball?" Anyway, as Miller points out, even more interesting than the obvious conflict of interest in the piece is the idea that the movie studio heads are apparently angry at Valenti for not adopting the RIAA's strategy of suing everyone.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    aNonMooseCowherd, 8 Nov 2003 @ 8:58pm

    so much for the NY Times

    With all the trouble the NY Times has had in the past year with just how honest they're being with the public, you would think they'd be bending over backwards to avoid anything that might look bad.

    Apparently they don't care, as long as the advertisers keep paying up.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.