Chinese Filters Not Stopping Political Discussions
from the maybe-you-can't-control-the-internet dept
When the internet was first catching on, there was all this talk about how it would be this revolutionary platform that was impossible to censor and would "route around" any attempts. More recently, though, people have been pointing to the examples of government online censorship in places like China and Saudi Arabia to suggest that's not true - and it
is possible to censor the internet. Well, now maybe we need to swing back to the original thesis, as a new study in China suggests that
the filters are largely ineffective and plenty of political speech is getting around them. For example, many who know that the text of what they're trying to say would be banned, are instead putting that information into image form where it's tougher for the government to track down. Meanwhile, many realize that they have much greater access to information online and, while they know that the government is trying to block some of it, with a little searching they can find info about almost anything (which probably explains why China tried to ban Google for a while). In fact, it sounds like the only real impact the filters are having on Chinese surfers is that it slows their internet connections down.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
What if
As for "outspoken" views on the Chinese internet, they aren't so much pro-democracy as they are pro-nationalist. Net forums across China celebrated when 9/11 happened.
Western governments are cracking down on a variety of communities they don't like, such as skinheads or pedophiles. It will be interesting to see how these repressions evolve in parallel.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
learning from the barrel of a gun...
The whole point to blocking speech is to require your oppoent to "innovate" so that you can latch on to new streams for monitoring. After you go through several iterations of this, your oppoent will develope a pattern and you will be able to predict his behavior ahead of time.
This is the only way to insure that purges are complete (purges, much like riots, are periods of opportunity that can not be exercised at will).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: learning from the barrel of a gun...
Western media are constantly reporting about how China has opened up. After they've reported the story, they turn to other things and then come back to China in 6 months or a year to tell the same story all over again, never noticing or thinking about what must be happening in China between one opening up period and the next. There have always been relatively open periods in China, and they're always followed by purges. Luckily, though, the Chinese Communist Party is not particularly competent. It became easier for Chinese to get outside news by satellite after the CCP forced all satellite television providers to use a Chinese company with obsolete technology (but good political connections). It apparently didn't occur to them that this corruption might loosen their control.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]