California To Require E-Voting Paper Trail

from the phew dept

Good news coming out of California today, as they've done the sensible thing and will require all electronic voting machines to include an auditable paper trail to make sure that the votes are accurate. Due to the size of California, it will require that the voting machine makers build such machines - and other states are sure to follow once they know paper-trail machines are available. Meanwhile, the article includes a number of quotes from critics who are against the idea saying that it adds cost and delays the voting process. Some complain that it takes away the benefit of electronic voting machines. That, of course, is ridiculous. Democracy isn't about being cheap or convenient. It's about letting everyone have a vote and having that vote counted accurately.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  1. identicon
    Beck, 21 Nov 2003 @ 2:18pm

    Audit Each Election

    Hopefully the law includes these two specifications:

  2. Ater each election the computerized results from a random selection of precincts are audited against the paper ballots.
  3. In the event of a recount, the recount is conducted using the paper ballots.

    Any public official who insists that it is not necessary to be able to audit election results for accuracy should be fired.

    The first to go should be Conny McCormack, the registrar for Los Angeles County, who said "There's absolutely no evidence of any problems with the accuracy of the current, certified electronic voting systems." Well of course there's no evidence Conny, because the current electronic voting systems do not provide the ability to audit their accuracy.

link to this | view in thread ]

  • identicon
    Topocho Blogger, 23 Apr 2004 @ 9:05am

    Democracy should be more than voting...

    But that should be a good starting point, here in Venezuela we would love having that...

    link to this | view in thread ]


  • Follow Techdirt
    Essential Reading
    Techdirt Deals
    Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
    Techdirt Insider Discord

    The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

    Loading...
    Recent Stories

    Friday

    19:39 Important Announcement: Techdirt Is Migrating To A New Platform (0)
    More arrow

    This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
    Close

    Email This

    This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.