Google Fighting Back Against Optimized Pages

from the interesting... dept

I've been hearing more and more people say that Google's algorithm is "broken". People are finding that the search engine optimizer people have figured out ways to game their PageRank system to get their pages to the top of Google's results, leaving more relevant pages out. Mostly this is true of commercial sites. I found this out last week when I tried to find the phone number for a particular hotel, and, instead, Google gave me listing after listing to help me book hotel rooms. Of course, Google is not going to stand still, and it appears that their latest adjustment is targeted directly at Google optimizers. The article is not particularly clear (though, maybe it makes sense to the search engine optimizers it's targeted for), but the summary appears to be that Google has added some sort of filter - and if the filter believes the site is too optimized it excludes the page from its results. In other words, it's trying to guess which sites are trying to hard to move up the Google ranks and punishes them for it. That's a pretty tight line to walk, and the writer of the article (a search engine optimizer) seems to think that there will be ways to beat it, and Google will have to ditch the plan. It does seem pretty difficult to figure out sites look too good for Google without blocking out plenty of legitimate sites as well.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Michael M, 24 Nov 2003 @ 3:44am

    No Subject Given

    Keep in mind that Google has said nothing about this and it's only a theory. Not even an original theory--the same thing has been theorized just about every time Google updates for years.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Gluefreak, 24 Nov 2003 @ 5:40am

    No Subject Given

    Another thing Google needs to filter for is Amazon Web Services. I published a book two years ago and when you search for it, you get tons of results for people's dynamically generated AWS sites. (Not that I object to the book appearing on those sites, since presumably more exposure = more sales.) But certainly those sites should not be ranking higher than legitimate book reviews, blogs in which the book is mentioned, and so forth. You'd think it would be a relatively simple thing to score AWS pages in relation to other pages, especially since they all have the exact same Amazon-provided content (which is just a mirror of what's on amazon.com anyway).

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.