If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...
- Phoenix City Council Says PD Can Have Surveillance Drones Without Any Policy In Place Because Some Officers Recently Got Shot
- New Right To Repair Bill Targets Obnoxious Auto Industry Behavior
- Former Employees Say Mossad Members Dropped By NSO Officers To Run Off-The-Books Phone Hacks
- San Francisco Cops Are Running Rape Victims' DNA Through Criminal Databases Because What Even The Fuck
- Clearview Pitch Deck Says It's Aiming For A 100 Billion Image Database, Restarting Sales To The Private Sector
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
I would bet the old marks are still somehow detectable though, so keep shredding that sensitive info.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
!
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Technology = Efficiency
Yeah, yeah, they have to be baked to erase the ink, and traces are sure to be left, but can't you just see a scene on "Law & Order" next year where the cops, warrant in hand, bust in on a roomful of frantic corporate lawyers with sensitive papers and hairdryers. :-P
[ link to this | view in thread ]
digital eraser
[ link to this | view in thread ]
No one will use it
Even if it's per minute, I doubt it would work very well. After paper has been printed on and passed around, it's generally not in good enough condition to be run through a typical printer again without causing lots of jams.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: No one will use it
[ link to this | view in thread ]