Kazaa Lobbyist Suggests Flat-Fee Plan
from the no-surprise-there dept
dsg writes in with a link to the story about the "Distributed Computing Industry Association" - which is really just the folks behind Kazaa - suggesting that a solution to the file sharing issue would be to just require all users to pay a monthly flat rate to use the systems. They suggest $5/month and say this would generate $200 million for the industry per month. While it does raise a lot of issues (who figures out who gets paid how much, for instance), I'm not totally against this idea. If it really opens up a true peer-to-peer file sharing system, rather than one of these annoying copy-restricted download stores - then it actually sounds good. A lot of people would be willing to pay the $5/month just to avoid the risk of getting sued and it would still allow all of the real benefits of peer-to-peer distribution. However, as is suggested in the article, the RIAA won't go for such a plan until it's way too late for it to make a difference.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Monetizing P2P
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
What you might see evolve out of this is the individual studio's setting up their own file sharing networks so that you can subscribe to the artists they manage for a small flat fee ,,,, still without down loads and Ripping.
At which point we're pretty much back to where we were, just a different medium.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
...in other news:
I mean, jesus, I don't know which is the stupider idea: trying to extract money from users sharing illegitimate content or believing that the recording industry will "opt-in" when/if KAZAA turns their first dime.
What planet do these fscks live on? ...cause I want to move there so I can be high all the time too.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]