VoIP, VoIP Everywhere
from the can't-avoid-it dept
Okay, VoIP is officially the hot topic of the season. You can't go anywhere without seeing a story about deals and/or regulation concerning VoIP. Just days after Time Warner made deals with Sprint and MCI to provide internet telephony to customers, AT&T came along and announced major VoIP plans themselves. (Update: Also just announced: Qwest is offering VoIP as well.) Everyone seems to forget, of course, that BellSouth actually tried to offer VoIP for about a week a year ago and suddenly someone higher up freaked out and pulled the plug. While the big telcos claim they're jumping on the VoIP bandwagon, there's still going to be an internal struggle of cash cow vs. emerging technology. I'm not convinced that the telcos are prepared to cannibalize their own business yet. Meanwhile, a lot of what will happen still depends on what the folks at the FCC decide to do about VoIP. Jeff Pulver has written up his concerns about the FCC's plans over at News.com. The piece is based on Reed Hundt's talk at Pulver's Wireless Summit. However, reading through it, it sounds as though it was written before the FCC's hearing on VoIP where it was made clear that Michael Powell would prefer not to regulate VoIP. That doesn't mean it won't happen, but the battlefield is becoming clearer. The upstarts continue to build marketshare (and lower prices - Vonage is now offering deals as low as $15/month), the telcos are waking up to the challenge, and the government is trying to figure out what to do about it. Who knows how it will all turn out - but it looks like we're going to have a lot more telephony choices in the near future.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
MCI Math
1. buy an expensive high-speed net connection
2. buy the software, and make everyone else buy it too
3. have to have the computer on to make a call
Sounds like video telephony -- the technology that's always just 10 years away from mass market use.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: MCI Math
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: MCI Math
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: MCI Math
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: MCI Math
What about the audio/video chat capabilities of software like MSN messenger? Does that count as VoIP, or is that considered something else?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Do you actually KNOW anything about VoIP?
Really?
Companies already have:
1) Computers on the desk
2) Wire to the computers
3) Sound cards
Adding Open Source VoIP ($0 cost) software and a headset ($5 to $9.95 at Wal*Mart) turns the PC into a 'telephone'.
Benefits:
Call logging
Call-database intergration
Call recording 'for quality control' (evidence)
The 'make everyone else buy software' also shows your total lack of knowledge. Using standards like H.323 and SIP means as long as you are standards compliant, the software can interoperate.
As opposed to "your solution" - a $300 phone that sits on the desk.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: MCI Math and VOIP
[ link to this | view in chronology ]