Kicked Out Of Parliament For Looking At A Camera Phone

from the take-that! dept

The latest slap down for daring to pick up a camera phone and (gasp! oh no!) look at it, was over in the UK where an MP was thrown out for checking his phone to see who had called. Someone noticed this, and informed the speaker, who kicked him out of the chamber for "using a camera". Except, he wasn't using the camera. Just looking to see who called. As he points out, if he wanted to use the camera it would be pretty obvious. Once again, you have to wonder why there's so much backlash against just having a camera phone, when the folks involved aren't doing anything bad with at all. Why are we making it a crime to possess tools that have plenty of perfectly good uses - just because there's the potential to misuse it?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Tony Lawrence, 18 Dec 2003 @ 12:01pm

    Just because of the potential?

    Heck, that's nothing new..we are chock full of laws that have to do with what MIGHT happen if we let you do x, y or z..

    Drug laws are a good example. I'm sure most of us know "casual" marijuana users - people who absolutely cause no harm to anyone (outside of helping to support organized crime, of course). But because the law assumes that they MIGHT start using other drugs, and MIGHT become addicts, thieves, burdens on society, whatever, we have laws.

    Plenty of other examples; in fact I bet fear of what MIGHT happen generates more laws than anything else.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 18 Dec 2003 @ 1:42pm

    No Subject Given

    "Why are we making it a crime to possess tools that have plenty of perfectly good uses - just because there's the potential to misuse it?"

    Can everybody say "KazaA"? ;o)

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    chris falco, 18 Dec 2003 @ 2:22pm

    kicked out

    I was at a stripclub once and was almost kicked out because the management thought my Hiptop was a camera. I think it was because of the full color screen and the clear pictures that were on the screen from a website. Now before you give me crap for being at a strip club and paying attention to my pda, let me defend myself by saying that there was an ugly amatuer on stage at the time, I was not ignoring the dancers ;)

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.