CD Arbitrage Slapped Down In The UK

from the higher-prices-for-everyone! dept

Because, apparently, fair market values for CDs are just too inexpensive for UK and Irish customers, the recording industry in the UK has slapped down an online company that dared to sell cheaper CDs they ordered from overseas. This is part of the same investigation of Amazon we mentioned a couple of weeks ago - though Amazon still hasn't caved in on the issue. Once again, I don't see how this sort of protectionist policy can stand. The company was simply ordering legal CDs at their fair market value and reselling them elsewhere. That's just good business. However, the UK recording industry wants to keep CD prices artificially high and therefore drive their customers to look for other alternatives (file sharing, ordering their own CDs from overseas, etc.). This does nothing to help the consumer at all.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Derek Lomas, 21 Jan 2004 @ 10:35am

    reconsider this one

    We must stringently prevent parallel trades like this, so as to protect regional pricing. Otherwise, music companies won't be able to sell music in low income areas for far less than high income areas, resulting in massive, organized crime controlled piracy. If you don't prevent parallel trades, then music has to cost the same high price everywhere. Doesn't it make sense that music sells for far less in Brazil, China, or Malaysia than the US or UK?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • icon
      Mike (profile), 21 Jan 2004 @ 10:39am

      Re: reconsider this one

      Why does that make sense? If they're getting the same product, why should they pay different amounts?

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Adrian Anders, 21 Jan 2004 @ 2:05pm

      Re: reconsider this one

      Of course, CDs could just be sold for the same LOW price everywhere. It's the record companies which are using their massive market control to drive the price of music up. They want piracy to go away? Then they should stop ripping their customers off!

      link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      LittleW0lf, 21 Jan 2004 @ 11:01pm

      Re: reconsider this one

      Otherwise, music companies won't be able to sell music in low income areas for far less than high income areas, resulting in massive, organized crime controlled piracy.

      Most people in low income areas are far more concerned about food, clothing, and shelter then the cost of Britney's latest CD.

      Organized crime exists in piracy because there is a profit to be made. The cost of developing a pirated CD is almost 1000% less than the cost of buying a legitimate one. Controlling the cost of CDs in low income areas while keeping the price artificially high in other areas only moves the contraband from low income areas to high income areas. Organized crime will produce the contraband in low income areas for distribution in high income areas.

      If the cost of the CD was a little more reasonable everywhere, and the product was worth the cost of the CD, then people would much rather purchase the legitimate CD then purchase a knock-off or borrow and copy. This is pretty much common sense, but the RIAA doesn't believe in common sense, and would rather call their customers thiefs and pirates, and sue 12 year old girls and 80 year old grandmothers than actually give their customers a product they want at the price they believe is reasonable.

      Until they learn this...everything they do along these lines are viewed as another attack on their customers in the name of their insatiable greed.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 22 Jan 2004 @ 2:01am

    What if I'm not in the UK or Ireland?

    I'm a CD Wow customer in Finland (where I already pay a levy on blank CDs to cover the fact that obviously they're all used for copying...) Now, because the BPI has a go at CD Wow, I end up paying �2 more for the CDs I buy. CD Wow used to charge me �9 for a product that costs �14 here. (I'll wait a week for delivery for that much saving!) Which part of this is actually encouraging me to go and buy more music and support their new artists?! When will they learn...

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories
This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.