Digital Property Ownership... Patented!
from the um...-wait dept
Well, here's a Friday afternoon patent stumper. We've had some great discussions lately about the issue of ownership of virtual goods in gaming environments and the crazy legal ramifications it's raising. However, most of us never thought to wonder if the idea of ownership of virtual goods had been patented. Apparently, it has been, as virtual ownership pioneer Julian Dibbell has discovered. You might recognize some of the names of the patent owners too. Ron Martinez, Greg Guerin, and Bruce Schneier happen to own a patent on a virtual property system. Ed Felten takes a look at the patent and suggest that it appears to cover the patent system itself. So, apparently, there's no need to debate the issues related to ownership of digital goods. It's already been patented. I also wonder if this can apply to any of the digital music services, as well.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
No Subject Given
The USPTO is not a regulatory agency. It is a database of known methods. It has already admitted that it only searches within its own database to find prior art. Adding one more element to the database harms noone. The vast majority of patents are used defensively, or as political bargaining chips between two rival corporations.
To be newsworthy, there has to be some conflict. Does the patent owner prosecute to withhold those obvious methods from someone else?
If nobody's suing over the patent, then STFU about patents, already; the story ain't worth the bandwidth it's printed on.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
"Cranky people should not have an internet connection." SAT '98
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]