Cheaper Car Insurance If We Can Spy On You
from the spyware-in-your-car dept
While there's been some talk about offering "telematics-specific" insurance policies, it's no surprise to see GM as the first to really move forward in the space - since they were the ones who revolutionized the market with OnStar. GMAC Insurance is going to start offering specific insurance policies to OnStar subscribers. There's a basic discount for those subscribers, which fits with OnStar's continued marketing push to show that OnStar makes people safer. However, the much more controversial part of the program is hidden at the bottom of the article. They're also going to begin tests of mileage based insurance programs. They're clear to point out that this will only be with the drivers' permission, but such policies have not gone over well with people in the past. The system would work by having OnStar send back data about how far the car has driven, and then will discount the insurance rates depending on how little the driver drove the car. Considering the potential for negative publicity to backfire on such a policy, it's no wonder that they're trying to sneak it out quietly. However, if it does catch on, expect similar programs to start showing up from plenty other insurance providers. It could become more difficult to get car insurance if you don't agree to include some sort of automotive spyware in your vehicle.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Let me see if I have this straight.
And for this 'feature' you are going to get SLIGHTLY less expensive insurance?
In return, you get all the auto-snoop features of On-Star, and your Insurance company can gain info about your mileage, perhaps speed and 'performance data' like you jackrabbited your car on Thursday?
Look folkes, if you are this mad at your money and like being rid of your filthy lucre as quickly as possible then I'll happly take it from you.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Freedom has a price
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Misquote
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a lower insurance premium deserve neither liberty nor discounts."
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
However, I'd rather see this implemented as a 'menu' selection of how you'd like to receive your discounts. For instance, you can monitor my speed ... but not the distance travelled. Or you can monitor how sharply I take turns, but not how hard I hit my breaks.
I consider myself a better than average follower of a number of the traffic laws (yes, the speed LIMIT is one of them) though not as good in some areas. I figure I'm basically being penalized as the 'average' driver (ie you assume I suck because I'm male) so why not let me serve up those things I do better than most and get credit for it (ie knock some cost off). But for those things I do fall into the average for ( sometimes I don't use a turn signal ) do not spy on me as you're going to charge me the standard going rate regardless.
While this may be just more spyware, it's spyware that could work for both the consumer and cooperate with a middle compromise.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
So, you want a cheaper rate.....what are you willing to do for this cheaper rate?
(ie you assume I suck because I'm male)
I'll suggest you look into changing your gender then.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
pay by the mile
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Progressive Insurance
Progressive has since cancelled the program, partly due to the cost of the hardware. Since GM cars already have the required hardware, this barrier is eliminated.
Progressive had promised their customers that the information would only be used for billing, and not used for any other purpose.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Progressive Insurance
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
useless data
as if anyone is particularly interested in aggregate data on a soccer mom's trips between Mikey D's & the local wal-fart each day ...
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Spies!
I agree that the system costs are too high for the value gotten from it. It was a nice idea, but no one ever thought about the security or privacy issues. How long before a hacker can open your doors?
[ link to this | view in chronology ]