Porn Bot Passes The Turing Test?
from the suspended-disbelief dept
While many AI researches discount the importance of the "Turing test," where a computer can trick a human into believe it's human as well, it's still the standard test that most people use. This article first suggests that spam has passed the Turing test when a well crafted subject convinces you to open the email - but that's probably not true. The "well-crafted" subject lines are not computer generated, but human created, and there's no "conversation". Most people realize immediately upon opening the email that they've been fooled. However, the article then points to the success of a
porn chat bot that users can SMS and have a "dirty" conversation. Apparently, it can hold up its end of the conversation very well, and most users have no idea they're not chatting with a human (and are thus convinced to keep on sending more expensive SMS messages). The system works like most chat bots, in trying to determine the best response, but also converts it to "txt speech" and throws in a few random spelling errors. Perhaps the scarier part, though, is that some users who do know it's a bot
like that and find it even more appealing.
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
pr()n bots
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Close, but not too close
The "Eliza" program has been known to fool humans in specific conversations, at least for the last 35 years; but usually it doesn't (it's only about 50 lines of Basic code.)
Nonetheless, Nata is impressive, and suggests that once again, porn will be an important innovator in the computer biz.
- The Precision Blogger
http://precision-blogging.blogspot.com
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Turing Test Two
[ link to this | view in thread ]
SEX
[ link to this | view in thread ]
New idea for porn chat
[ link to this | view in thread ]