Ingram, Amazon Lose Patent Battle On On-Demand Printing
from the this-is-non-obvious? dept
These days, there are a ton of on-demand printing operations out there that will let people create a book on the fly. In some areas, they're just catching on, sometimes for vanity publishing and sometimes for better inventory control. However, it turns out that someone has a patent on the idea of on-demand printing - and a jury has ruled that Amazon and Ingram are both violating that patent. Both defendants say they believe the patent is not valid and will appeal. Unfortunately, the actual patent is not clearly explained in the article. They do say that the inventor met with Ingram prior to them starting up their own on-demand printing service - so he might have some claim. The real question is what the patent really covers - and if it's simply for the idea of on-demand printing, if that's really patentable.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Internet Bookmobile
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Patent Silliness
>>The real question is what the patent really covers - and if it's simply for the idea of on-demand printing, if that's really patentable.
Since when is it necessary to present a credible idea for patenting? Amazon/Microsoft/et al have been patenting 1's and 0's for cryin' out loud. The USPTO is too busy/lazy/incompetent to check for prior art anyway.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Looks like 5,465,213
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Looks like 5,465,213
That's does not seem to be worth a patent. I'm sure that prior to 1990 some organization printed documents, even just plain text ASCII ones when a customer wanted one.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: Looks like 5,465,213
The `invention' compared to the articles seems to be `um, automate the finishing'.
[ link to this | view in thread ]