Why Nanotech Hype Is Good

from the unless-you-lose-all-your-money dept

Bubbles come and go - especially in the technology world. As this article points out, in the sixties, if your company had "tron" or "tronics" in your name, you were hot. More recently there were the dot coms or the e-something or i-something companies. Nowadays, it seems that nano-anything is setting Wall Street on fire, despite most of the companies being years away from actually proving themselves as viable businesses. Still, while many will invest lots of money into these bubbles that will disappear down the blackhole of failed companies, the article points out that this is a good thing, for the most part. Some bubbles are just silly - but when it comes to bubbles surrounding general-purpose technology that is clearly useful in some way, the most efficient way to figure out how to use that technology seems to be to throw an awful lot of money at an awful lot of companies and see what sticks. Certainly, a lot of people end up losing money that way, but the success stories do show up, and by placing so many bets, it allows lots of different ideas to get tested (and rejected) very quickly. So, while it's no fun riding the wrong horse, and people complain about the hype surrounding a bubble, if the core technology holds promise, maybe a bubble isn't such a bad thing.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • icon
    Daniel (profile), 11 Oct 2006 @ 6:45am

    "Screwed?"

    I wouldn't say that the investors are getting screwed in these cases. They are knowingly making a high risk investment - one that is easily more honest than your average lottery (which guarantees that half of all money put in gets scooped out of the pot and put into government projects before anyone gets anything).

    And if there is any misunderstanding of the risks involved, it is more often the result of the false sense of security provided by SEC regulations that, while punishing businesses and investors, offers no hope of compensation - or really any promise of ethical behavior - from the companies they "regulate."

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.