Man Sues Kazaa For Copyright Violation... Saying They Stole His Code

from the seems-like-a-stretch dept

While the entertainment industry has been throwing lawsuit after lawsuit against Kazaa for aiding and abetting copyright violations, a Microsoft programmer is claiming that Kazaa is guilty of direct copyright infringement - of his own code. He claims that he wrote the original code for Kazaa as an independent contractor, before current owner Sharman bought the technology from Kazaa B.V.. He says that he never had a contract with them, and thus, they had no right to sell his code. This seems like it would be incredibly difficult to prove. Clearly, there was some kind of (at least) verbal contract between the parties, or why would he have written the code for them in the first place?
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    AUSTIN, 17 Mar 2004 @ 1:14am

    Work-for-hire

    In USA it is black-letter law (it was tried and appealed all the way to the Supreme Court): if a work is performed without an express work-for-hire contract, the work is the sole property of the person who made. It doesn't matter if the person was paid: no contract, no work-for-hire.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.