Are New Cars Too Expensive To Fix?
from the the-price-of-all-those-gadgets.. dept
With all the expensive safety equipment, electronics, sensors and gadgets in new cars, it's getting to the point where it's increasingly less reasonable to fix them if they've been in an accident. The article includes an example story of a relatively new BMW that was flipped: despite a lack of serious structural damage, the car was considered totaled by the insurance company, in large part due to the cost of replacing all six airbags (including the sensors and pyrotechnics) that went off in the accident. Even fancier lighting is causing problems. Xenon headlights have become quite popular among thieves - but can cost thousands of dollars to replace, especially when additional body damage is done by the thief. Some are even saying that we're creating "disposable" cars that are simply too expensive to repair when things go wrong.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
or..
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
disposible
We've created a whole disposible economy.
My take on it is that if a car was made to last a LOT longer, I'd be willing to pay more (even take longer finance terms) to buy it...as it is, most cars won't last beyond 4-5 years without extremely anal measures...
But execs think this is a losing proposition, its not that they WOULDN'T make money...they wouldn't make MORE MONEY...its that "MORE MONEY" that causes the problem.
Greed, it does a body bad.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: disposible - BS
Let's separate issues with high-tech gadgetry that's expensive to repair (the issue in the article) with general car reliability, which is higher, and safety, which is WAY higher (and part of the reason for the increase in repair costs).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
Are my chances of dying higher if my car doesn't have all those gadgets? If so, then I would rather have them.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Airbags
This has happened with almost every feature on a car over the past 100 years. Seatbelts, collapsible steering columns, crumple zones.. you name it all started out a major safety improvements, and ended up as standard safety features.
What really drives up the cost of repairing a wrecked vehicle is the type of tools and experience required to work on these newer, more complicated systems (ie Labor).
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
So too the increased cost of the gadgets, plus the insurance costs that get passed down (total $40-odd-k of Beamer and somebody's eating it, and it ain't your friendly insurance company) plus the increased cost of labor when they actually fix the stuff, means you wind up with a)cars that are really safe, but fairly expensive, b)cars that are fairly safe and moderately priced, c)cars of dubious safety that are very cheap, i.e. used piles of rust that somehow pass inspection. Those of us who can, buy the level of safety and conveniance we can. But the net effect is, we price a lot of people out of safer cars than they'd otherwise be in. Especially since the auto industry (Motto:'Why do they need seatbelts AND airbags?') isn't giving away anything without getting sued or ordered to by the government.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
-Charles W.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]