Instant Messaging Taking On More Importance

from the it's-everywhere dept

For all the talk of a battle over search and web-based email, not as many people have been paying attention to the growing battle over instant messaging services. Many people spend a lot of time each day in their IM programs - sometimes even more than their browser. Realizing this, Yahoo, Microsoft and AOL are all working to more closely integrate other aspects of their service into instant messaging. I'm still surprised that none of them have more actively turned their instant messaging program into a Friendster-like social networking service - since it seems like a much more natural fit than having to go into a website and list all your friends. With most IM services, you already have your list of friends and there's an actual practical use to it beyond surfing through friends of friends. The article also mentions (as we have before) the idea that Google should offer their own instant messaging client. Of course, the article brushes over the issue of interoperability, claiming that people haven't really been asking for it. That's not true. I've been asking for it for years, and know plenty of others who have as well. While the various services believe they need to stay as separate islands for the purposes of "lock-in," they're simply driving people away. I wouldn't need to use products like Trillian if Yahoo or AIM worked with each other. Just like text messaging on phones and email systems over a decade ago - once people decided to let them communicate across boundaries, they found that everyone did a lot more with them. It doesn't take people away, it makes them use the services more.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2004 @ 10:02am

    Orkut

    Nail on the head Mike. Google need to toss jabber into its Orkut. It's got the servers, and it's got (some of our) info already. It could really branch out for them.


    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Jeff, 27 Apr 2004 @ 11:46am

      Re: Orkut

      I don't know why it's so much to ask that AOL, MS, Yahoo, etc all switch to some sort of open-standards communication protocol. How great would it be to export your contacts into XML and import them into another IM client, or into your PDA, cell phone, etc.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        thecaptain, 27 Apr 2004 @ 12:33pm

        Re: Orkut

        or even better...just stick to the app you are comfortable with and be able to contact everyone across the board! :)

        Like email I guess.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

        • identicon
          AMetamorphosis, 27 Apr 2004 @ 12:41pm

          Trillian


          But Trillian DOES work with a flawed system.

          Waiting for legislation to catch up with the technology is useless and it makes better sense to use the easiest solution to an ongoing problem. I've used Trillian for 2+ years and its money well spent.

          link to this | view in chronology ]

          • icon
            Mike (profile), 27 Apr 2004 @ 12:58pm

            Re: Trillian

            The problem with Trillian though is that these companies occassionally block service - which isn't really feasible. Plus, it doesn't take advantage of specific features added to IM programs. Thus, you're creating a world of incompatible technologies. A bridge solution just doesn't cut it.

            link to this | view in chronology ]

            • identicon
              Anonymous Coward, 27 Apr 2004 @ 2:07pm

              Re: Trillian

              Get Trillian Pro Mike. It has alot of the special features and more.

              ie. renamign of contacts, tabbed windows [which aim doesn't even have].

              Webcam for yahoo, plugins for other stuff, etc, its there.

              Not everythign, but a good deal of it.

              link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    xman, 28 Apr 2004 @ 4:40am

    MS

    Microsfot *are* working on just such a social networking system. I can't remember the name offhand but it is definitely in the works.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.