Clickers In The Classroom

from the learning-like-a-gameshow dept

Wed, Apr 28th 2004 6:18pm — Mike Masnick

Last year we had an article about the rising popularity of gameshow-like multiple choice wireless devices being used in the classroom. The idea was that professors could regularly ask questions of students and have them all input their answers - and get an immediate feel for whether or not the students were understanding the lesson. Now, the NY Times has picked up on the technology and has a similar article saying that many students and professors using the technology say it's been great in improving the classroom experience. Professors say that the class is more engaged (and less likely to be surfing the web or IMing during class) and focused on the material. It also means that the professor can more rapidly adjust the lesson in real-time if people aren't understanding. It certainly works better than the former proxy method where a single student would be asked (or would ask) a question, which the professor would use to determine whether or not the lesson was getting across. As with many technologies, it sounds like there are unintended benefits as well - incorporating the technology results directly into classroom lessons - such as using it to demonstrate statistics techniques on the fly, or using results as part of a sociological point. It also allows students who normally don't like to raise their hand to make their confusion known, without singling themselves out. Finally, students say that it just makes the class more fun, as it seems more like a gameshow (an analogy used in last year's article as well). There's one quote at the end from someone who is skeptical about the technology - but doesn't give much of a reason why, except that similar technology 30 years ago was a failure. Of course, that was 30 years ago, and I imagine the technology is a bit different these days. He also makes the point that the professor still needs to be a good teacher. I don't think anyone is saying otherwise. It's just that this technology can be used to enhance a good professor's lesson.

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team

7 Comments

If you liked this post, you may also be interested in...

Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread

Anonymous Coward, 28 Apr 2004 @ 10:23pm

No Subject Given
Of course, that was 30 years ago, and I imagine the technology is a bit different these days.
Perhaps a bit different, but not necessarily significantly different, I imagine.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
chris falco, 28 Apr 2004 @ 11:45pm

english
my english professor would whoop you up for this though:

" it sounds like their are unintended benefits as well"
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
thecaptain, 29 Apr 2004 @ 5:29am

No Subject Given
The problem here is that multiple choice, unless the questions and answers are tricky or very cleverly thought out, or there are MANY options (like 6 or more) aren't really a good yardstick for testing knowledge, because there's always the possibility of guessing a correct answer.

(As a kid, I used to love the true or false tests...50/50 if I didn't know the answer!)

Of course, statistically, maybe its more accurate spread over a large class since not everyone is going to guess...just the numnuts goffing off at the back.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Ann, 29 Apr 2004 @ 7:16am

Especially good for some cultures
I taught at an Asian University that was working on this 7 or 8 years ago. In their culture, it was too confrontational to ask questions in class, so I would get a line of a dozen or more students afterwards, all waiting to ask the same thing. What I eventually learned was that they were doing this for me as well as for themselves - if they asked a question that I couldn't answer, it would be a huge loss of face for me. To their way of thinking, public questions/discussions are a no-win situation.
This system didn't totally solve the problem, but it was a good way to get them involved. They were usually paying attention but hated the thought of having to say anything in class. The remotes got the students more involved and gave the professor some feedback (even if some were guessing) on whether they were following the material. It's a good idea.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Frozen Chrome, 29 Apr 2004 @ 9:28am

30 years ago
"Class, please pay attention to the 4 answers on the blackboard", notes the teacher as she points to written multiple choice list on the well used board.
"Those of you who think the answer is A, please raise your hand."
"Those of you who think the answer is B, please raise your hand."
"Those of you who think the answer is C, please raise your hand."
...
Add some color and flavor to the mix, and voila, no need to use already limited school resources for additional short lived technological solutions. The results are the same. So much for technology ....
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
- Mike (profile), 29 Apr 2004 @ 9:35am
  
  Re: 30 years ago
  That still requires publicly making your choice known... the benefit here is that your peers don't know what you've chosen, so there's less peer pressure.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]
- a professor, 29 Apr 2004 @ 10:06am
  
  Re: 30 years ago
  I haven't used these clickers, but one additional advantage involves requiring every student to commit to a choice. With hand-raising, it's often clear that many students either don't vote at all or wait until they see how their peers vote before joining the crowd. The clicker doesn't require a well-thought-out choice, but it is likely to lead more students to be involved because they have to make a decision, instead of waiting for the outspoken students or the professor to provide the answer.
  [ link to this | view in chronology ]