Fun With Biased Studies, Or How To Use Misleading Stats To Bash Technology
from the let's-look-a-bit-closer... dept
Back in January we wrote about a ridiculously bad study done by a so-called "children's charity" named NCH which blamed the internet for child porn by confusing correlation with causation (they noted that the number of child porn arrest increased with the internet - and thus, decided it was the internet, and not those involved with child porn, who should be held responsible). Now, the folks from NCH are back again with yet another misleading study. This time, they're claiming that (oh no!) 86% of parents fear 3G phones will threaten the safety of their children, while saying that data services on mobile phones should be classified as "adult services." You can go to the NCH website directly and download a huge pdf file that has the details of the study. Here's how they got the answers they wanted. They started with a very strong leading question making it sound like 3G phones are horrible: "Do you agree or disagree with this statement: 'It's hard enough today to supervise and support children who use the internet as it is. It sounds as though new 3G phones will make that more or less impossible. If they're using them out on the street, on the bus or in the school playground, you just can't be there to help them.'" Kind of difficult to say no to that without knowing a lot more details - which NCH doesn't bother to provide. Then, follow that up immediately with the question you're going to send to the press, having already made people think that, damn, those 3G phones sound awful: "Do you agree or disagree with the statement: 'I am concerned that 3G phones with internet access could threaten a child's safety.'" Bingo. Instant, unquestioning press coverage of how 3G mobile phones with internet access are the devil's work.Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
AT&T Over Charging Consumers
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: AT&T Over Charging Consumers
1) Declare to AT&T publicly that you demand satisfaction. (I think this is done).
2) Find a second.
3) Have your second arrange terms of the meeting, weapons, paces, etc with AT&T's second.
4) Meet up and offer AT&T one more chance to satisfy you.
5) Continue with the duel.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: AT&T Over Charging Consumers
I honestly do not understand what either of these posts have to do with this story.
To the person getting screwed by the phone companies:
Hire a lawyer.
[ link to this | view in thread ]
Re: AT&T Over Charging Consumers
[ link to this | view in thread ]