Telecommuters Causing Mistrust In The Workplace?
from the all-depends-on-how-you-go-about-it dept
A new study suggests that with the rise in telecommuters, many employees have never even met some of their closest colleagues. Because of that, many workers feel that they don't have as close a relationship to those colleagues as they should, and may not trust them as much as those they work with in person. In other words, there are other unintended consequences of telecommuting. Again, this seems to be the sort of thing that's highly dependent on how the telecommuting is done. For a team that works in a dispersed manner, it's still helpful for them to get together on a regular basis. "Invisible" workers who are going to be working closely with each other should be brought together occasionally. It may not completely solve the mistrust issue, but it's better than having them be completely faceless.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Face Time Important
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
I have found that these sort of issues come into play when there is a gap in communication somewhere. But that's true of most social problems.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: No Subject Given
I'm in a situation where for me, things can vary...one month I'll be working on a very team oriented project, another month I'll be getting a complicated one-man project up and running.
When I have to work with my team, it pays to be in the office..we talk, we bounce ideas back and forth and even when coding we're all together..things go smoothly.
When I'm the only one on a particular project, I work a LOT faster alone at home. I found I can get a full day's work done in a couple of hours usually...because at work, I have a LOT of co-workers with NO analytical skills who insist on using me as their second-brain rather than thinking things through. When being interrupted every 5 mins, I simply cannot get a good groove going that allows me to focus on the task at hand (and I can't just close my office door since I don't have one)
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Value of face time
Email is useful for communicating and expressing ideas, but I noticed even back in 1982 that it led to misunderstandings since the other person's context cannot be seen or felt.
Here's my take on digital technologies:
Email/IM/blogs -- "narrowband" even if you use DSL
Phones -- a little better "narrowband"
Videoconferencing -- low-end "broadband"
Virtual reality -- medium "broadband"
Face time -- ultrawide, real-time immersion broadband (when measured in absolute pixels or bytes per second)
My conclusion is that face time is essential for deeper understanding of another person's context, developing trust, and interacting spontaneously and appropriately (especially the latter). It's easy to flame people over the net, but difficult to do so face-to-face since there's a powerful social agreement implicit in meeting in person.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]