Opening Up WiFi Networks To Deny Responsibility

from the good-luck-with-that... dept

A short article in Salon comes across a bit too innocently, about someone who has decided to open up their WiFi access to anyone close enough to use it in order to deny any responsibility for any illegal traffic that goes over his network. This isn't a new argument. It's been used before. The problem is that it's unlikely to work. We've pointed out in the past that all of the RIAA's lawsuits against individuals contain no proof that that particular individual was sharing files, but that hasn't stopped the courts from deeming them valid (though, no one has really tested it yet). In this particular article, the guy uses Comcast, and even taunts them that he'll deny any responsibility if he gets accused of sharing music or movie files. Of course, Comcast will immediately cut him off for violating his terms of service that say he can't share his account via WiFi. In theory, he could even be charged with a felony for helping to share an internet connection. Meanwhile, the article attempts to raise deeper issues that we've touched on before about whose responsibility is it if you get hacked. Is it your own responsibility for having weak security? The writer of this article seems to think that's a perfectly valid excuse - even though he's purposely setting the system up with weak security. Considering the recent fines by the government against companies that set up weak security that allowed them to get hacked, he might not have much of an argument. All of that being said, I do think sharing WiFi is a good idea - if your ISP allows you to do it. I think more ISPs should allow (or even encourage) users to share their connection via WiFi, because it makes the connection that much more useful. That doesn't mean there aren't security concerns, but those can be dealt with if the person setting up the system, and those connecting to it are smart about how they do so.
Hide this

Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.

Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.

While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.

–The Techdirt Team


Reader Comments

Subscribe: RSS

View by: Time | Thread


  • identicon
    Beck, 18 May 2004 @ 6:38pm

    Sharing Can Hurt

    Sharing your Internet connection via WiFi can turn it into a dog.

    I couldn't get WEP to work, so I left my connection open. Recently my speeds slowed to a crawl. I happened to check the DHCP user list, and found that someone was using my connection.

    I turned on logging, and found that, based on the ports being used, they were probably running BitTorrent. So not only did they kill my performance, but now I'm paranoid that I'll be hearing from the IP freaks.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

    • identicon
      Not A. Zealot, 18 May 2004 @ 11:41pm

      Re: Sharing can hurt (performance)

      Check out PF: Packet Queueing and Prioritization.
      In it's most simple form, this let's you prioritize your outbound bandwidth, reserving a percentage of the available pipe for your personal use.

      link to this | view in chronology ]

      • identicon
        Ed, 19 May 2004 @ 12:33am

        Re: Sharing can hurt (performance)

        Yeah, but if you carefully tweak your connection to prioritize your bandwidth, while avoiding doing anything simple to secure your connection, you're going to have a hard time convincing me (or a judge) that you've got a legitimate excuse for anything that originates from your connection.

        I think it's similar to when the operators of a huge BBS (pre-Internet days) were busted for privacy. The operators claimed that because of the massive size of their BBS, they couldn't police everything for pirated content. But they sure took the effort to make sure that every image or zip file that entered their system got tagged with one of their ads.

        link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Milnesy, 19 May 2004 @ 7:35am

    but wait.... if I share wifi it's wrong.... but...

    if comcast is offering a linksys wifi router it's ok? I don't understand it... you can hack the comcast branded wifi router to open it up, so would it still be wrong?

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    jerkha bherka, 29 Jul 2006 @ 4:57am

    Are you retarded

    Yes it would, you moron.

    link to this | view in chronology ]

  • identicon
    Anonymous Coward, 1 Feb 2007 @ 7:10pm

    This article clearly has an agenda.

    link to this | view in chronology ]


Follow Techdirt
Essential Reading
Techdirt Deals
Report this ad  |  Hide Techdirt ads
Techdirt Insider Discord

The latest chatter on the Techdirt Insider Discord channel...

Loading...
Recent Stories

This site, like most other sites on the web, uses cookies. For more information, see our privacy policy. Got it
Close

Email This

This feature is only available to registered users. Register or sign in to use it.