Free The Mobile Phones To Make Them More Expensive
from the consumer-protection? dept
At Techdirt, we're big supporters of consumer rights and convincing companies to do what's right for consumers - but sometimes these groups seem to forget to think one step ahead towards the consequences of their actions. That seems to be the case with a group that is trying to sue wireless carriers to force them to offer unlocked mobile phones which can be used on various networks (though, only the GSM networks, since that's the only case where it would matter). As Eric Lin writes in TheFeature, if this gets anywhere, it could make things worse for the very "consumers" they're trying to protect. Most mobile phones these days are heavily subsidized by the carriers - and forcing them to offer unlocked phones will likely mean much greater reluctance to offer such a subsidy on a phone that could be taken to another provider. Instead, prices for most phones would rise sharply - harming everyone who isn't concerned about having an unlocked phone. Since there already are unlocked phones on the market (though, as you might expect, they're a bit pricier) it seems like the market is working this one out by itself. Those who want an unlocked phone can pay for it, while everyone else gets the benefit of cheaper phones. So far, it appears that most buyers prefer the cheaper price to the idea that, one day, they may want to pop in another providers SIM card to switch mobile carriers.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
unlocked is your friend
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Not GSM only
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Not GSM only
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
No Subject Given
I would rather pay full cost for a phone then use a 2 year forced contract.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
FREE THE PHONES !!!!
I'm with you !
I would MUCH RATHER pay for my own phone then be stuck in a crappy contract in order to get my LOCKED phone that is useless if I do up and tell the carrier to cram it, pay the exorbitant " early termination fee " & tell them to piss off.
Imagine if our cars only ran on specific gasolines because Ford partners with Shell or Chevy with Exxon ?
Do you sign a 2 year contract on any other utility you use ? Why do we put up with this crap ?
BTW Mike, UNLOCKING phones just MIGHT reduce the exorbitant amount of phones we dispose of every time we change cell carriers. I think that cost needs to be taken into account as well.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FREE THE PHONES !!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FREE THE PHONES !!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FREE THE PHONES !!!!
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: FREE THE PHONES !!!!
This is what I have been told be several Cingular reps (in store and on the phone).
And even if you do use one, I somehow doubt that they are going to let you sign up without a long term contract.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]