Debating Micropayments
from the yes-and-no dept
Clay Shirky got a lot of attention last year for his essay on why micropayments don't work - focusing mainly on the addition of "mental transaction costs" as an additional cost above and beyond the monetary micropayment cost. Not everyone has agreed (especially those involved with micropayment companies). Vin Crosbie has now chimed in to explain why Shirky is wrong about micropayments by saying that the mental transactions of micropayments don't always need to stop the transaction. As an example, he points out that people pay for water, telephone calls and electricity in micropayment fashion and never seem too bothered by it. This is true - but what's missing is that in all three cases these are both necessities and there are (or, in the case of telephone, were) no other options for providers. When there's no competition, you can charge and people will accept it - especially if it's a basic necessity. However, when competition does come about, the pricing starts to drop, and the idea of additional fees-per-transaction start to go away. Witness what is happening with the telephone industry. With the rise of VoIP systems, almost all telecom companies in the US are now offering some sort of flat-rate deal where there are no micropayments for each transaction. In the case of undifferentiated content, where there are plenty of other content providers online (with the possible exception of very specialized content), it will be very difficult to charge any form of micropayment.
Thank you for reading this Techdirt post. With so many things competing for everyone’s attention these days, we really appreciate you giving us your time. We work hard every day to put quality content out there for our community.
Techdirt is one of the few remaining truly independent media outlets. We do not have a giant corporation behind us, and we rely heavily on our community to support us, in an age when advertisers are increasingly uninterested in sponsoring small, independent sites — especially a site like ours that is unwilling to pull punches in its reporting and analysis.
While other websites have resorted to paywalls, registration requirements, and increasingly annoying/intrusive advertising, we have always kept Techdirt open and available to anyone. But in order to continue doing so, we need your support. We offer a variety of ways for our readers to support us, from direct donations to special subscriptions and cool merchandise — and every little bit helps. Thank you.
–The Techdirt Team
Reader Comments
Subscribe: RSS
View by: Time | Thread
Debating Micropayments
But you forget that in such cases the price isn't really free because the vendor is still charging the user a monthly fee ($20). By contrast, Shirky's contention was that information will really be free, with no costs at all (neither monthly nor metered) for the consumer. I don't think that will happen. I don't think that advertising revenue alone will support professional production of online content nor millions (or eveb tens or hundreds of millions) or amateur blogs.
As readers of my ClickZ column probably by now know, I'm against 98 percent of publishers' attempts to charge for online content. But I do think there is a need and market for that other 2 percent, particularly at microtransaction levels. We just don't yet have the mechanisms by which to do that.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Sophisticated Scam Alert
Reading about scams on techdirt helped give me the right reflexes in dealing with this guy. I did not give him a shred of personal info.
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sophisticated Scam Alert
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sophisticated Scam Alert
[ link to this | view in chronology ]
Re: Sophisticated Scam Alert
[ link to this | view in chronology ]